Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 196

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Unveiling the Full Potential of Flexible Receptor Docking Using Multiple Crystallographic Structures

Barril, Xavier, Morley, S. David·2005·Journal of Medicinal Chemistry

Abstract

One of the current challenges in docking studies is the inclusion of receptor flexibility. This is crucial because the binding sites of many therapeutic targets sample a wide range of conformational states, which has major consequences on molecular recognition. In this paper, we make use of very large sets of X-ray structures of cyclin dependent kinase 2 (CDK2) and heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) to assess the performance of flexible receptor docking in binding-mode prediction and virtual screening experiments. Flexible receptor docking performs much better than rigid receptor docking in the former application. Regarding the latter, we observe a significant improvement in the prediction of binding affinities, but owing to an increase in the number of false positives, this is not translated into better hit rates. A simple scoring scheme to correct this limitation is presented. More importantly, pitfalls inherent to flexible receptor docking have been identified and guidelines are presented to avoid them.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jm048972v

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 196

Metadata

Authors
Barril, X., & Morley, S. D.
Venue
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
Published
2005-05-24
Volume
48
Issue
13
Pages
4432-4443
ISSN
  • 0022-2623 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-4804
OpenAlex
W2084485490
Cited by
196
References
4
FWCI
10.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.