Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 241

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Robust QSAR Models Using Bayesian Regularized Neural Networks

Burden, Frank R., Winkler, David A.·1999·Journal of Medicinal Chemistry

Abstract

We describe the use of Bayesian regularized artificial neural networks (BRANNs) in the development of QSAR models. These networks have the potential to solve a number of problems which arise in QSAR modeling such as: choice of model; robustness of model; choice of validation set; size of validation effort; and optimization of network architecture. The application of the methods to QSAR of compounds active at the benzodiazepine and muscarinic receptors is illustrated.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jm980697n

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 241

Metadata

Authors
Burden, F. R., & Winkler, D. A.
Venue
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
Published
1999-07-24
Volume
42
Issue
16
Pages
3183-3187
ISSN
  • 0022-2623 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-4804
OpenAlex
W2046653925
Cited by
241
References
2
FWCI
6.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Robust QSAR Models Using Bayesian Regularized Neural Networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jm980697n
The paper
Burden, F. R., & Winkler, D. A. (1999). Robust QSAR Models Using Bayesian Regularized Neural Networks. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm980697n

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.