The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predicting Blood−Brain Barrier Permeation from Three-Dimensional Molecular Structure
Open accessAbstract
Predicting blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeation remains a challenge in drug design. Since it is impossible to determine experimentally the BBB partitioning of large numbers of preclinical candidates, alternative evaluation methods based on computerized models are desirable. The present study was conducted to demonstrate the value of descriptors derived from 3D molecular fields in estimating the BBB permeation of a large set of compounds and to produce a simple mathematical model suitable for external prediction. The method used (VolSurf) transforms 3D fields into descriptors and correlates them to the experimental permeation by a discriminant partial least squares procedure. The model obtained here correctly predicts more than 90% of the BBB permeation data. By quantifying the favorable and unfavorable contributions of physicochemical and structural properties, it also offers valuable insights for drug design, pharmacological profiling, and screening. The computational procedure is fully automated and quite fast. The method thus appears as a valuable new tool in virtual screening where selection or prioritization of candidates is required from large collections of compounds.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Can We Learn To Distinguish between “Drug-like” and “Nondrug-like” Molecules?
Ajay, Walters, W. P., & Murcko, M. A. (1998) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm970666c · Cited by 484
A Scoring Scheme for Discriminating between Drugs and Nondrugs
Sadowski, J., & Kubinyi, H. (1998) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm9706776 · Cited by 392
Cited by
High throughput artificial membrane permeability assay for blood–brain barrier
Di, L., Kerns, E. H., Fan, K., McConnell, O. J., & Carter, G. T. (2003) · European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0223-5234(03)00012-6 · Cited by 1,195
Carpenter, T. S., Kirshner, D. A., Lau, E. Y., Wong, S. E., Nilmeier, J. P., & Lightstone, F. C. (2014) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2014.06.024 · Cited by 306
Pharmacokinetically Based Mapping Device for Chemical Space Navigation
Oprea, T. I., Zamora, I., & Ungell, A.-L. (2002) · Journal of Combinatorial Chemistry · doi:10.1021/cc010093w · Cited by 77
Biological and Computational Evaluation of Resveratrol Inhibitors against Alzheimer's Disease
Koukoulitsa, C., Villalonga-Barber, C., Csonka, R., Alexi, X., Leonis, G., Dellis, D., Hamelink, E., Belda, O., Steele, B. R., Micha-Screttas, M., et al. (2016) · Journal of Enzyme Inhibition and Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.3109/14756366.2014.1003928 · Cited by 37
Benzothiazole-Based LRRK2 Inhibitors as Wnt Enhancers and Promoters of Oligodendrocytic Fate
Zaldivar-Diez, J., Li, L., Garcia, A. M., Zhao, W.-N., Medina-Menendez, C., Haggarty, S. J., Gil, C., Morales, A. V., & Martinez, A. (2020) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b01752 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Crivori, P., Cruciani, G., Carrupt, P.-A., & Testa, B.
- Venue
- Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2000-05-16
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2204-2216
- ISSN
- 0022-2623 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4804
- OpenAlex
- W2065457701
- Cited by
- 430
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 21.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.