Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 219

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Comparison of the Adsorption and Diffusion of Hydrogen on the {111} Surfaces of Ni, Pd, and Pt from Density Functional Theory Calculations

Watson, Graeme W., Wells, Richard P. K., Willock, David J., Hutchings, Graham J.·2001·The Journal of Physical Chemistry B

Abstract

We present gradient corrected density function theory calculations on the adsorption and thermally activated diffusion pathways of hydrogen on the {111} surfaces of Ni, Pd, and Pt. We find that the variation of the adsorption energy as a function of adsorption site shows considerable differences between the three metals. For Ni and Pd, the adsorption energies vary as a function of hydrogen coordination with the 3-fold hollow sites the most stable and the 1-fold atop site considerably less stable. On Pt the adsorption energies for all the sites are similar indicating that diffusion across the surface will be faster on Pt than on Ni or Pd. The activation energies for diffusion have been calculated with that for Pt (2−3 kJ mol -1 ) considerably smaller than for Ni or Pd (13 kJ mol -1 ). The calculated adsorption and activation energies are in good agreement with experimental investigations of the structure, energetics, and diffusion properties.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jp002864c

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Watson, G. W., Wells, R. P. K., Willock, D. J., & Hutchings, G. J.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
Published
2001-05-01
Volume
105
Issue
21
Pages
4889-4894
ISSN
  • 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6106
OpenAlex
W2079157603
Cited by
219
References
0
FWCI
3.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.