Cited by 766Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionCO2 Reduction Techniques and CatalystsFuel Cells and Related Materials

Nitrogen-doped tungsten carbide nanoarray as an efficient bifunctional electrocatalyst for water splitting in acid

Open access
Han, Nana, Yang, Ke R., Lu, Zhiyi, Li, Yingjie, Xu, Wenwen, Gao, Tengfei, Cai, Zhao, Zhang, Ying +3 more·2018·Nature Communications

Abstract

Tungsten carbide is one of the most promising electrocatalysts for the hydrogen evolution reaction, although it exhibits sluggish kinetics due to a strong tungsten-hydrogen bond. In addition, tungsten carbide’s catalytic activity toward the oxygen evolution reaction has yet to be reported. Here, we introduce a superaerophobic nitrogen-doped tungsten carbide nanoarray electrode exhibiting high stability and activity toward hydrogen evolution reaction as well as driving oxygen evolution efficiently in acid. Nitrogen-doping and nanoarray structure accelerate hydrogen gas release from the electrode, realizing a current density of −200 mA cm−2 at the potential of −190 mV vs. reversible hydrogen electrode, which manifest one of the best non-noble metal catalysts for hydrogen evolution reaction. Under acidic conditions (0.5 M sulfuric acid), water splitting catalyzed by nitrogen-doped tungsten carbide nanoarray starts from about 1.4 V, and outperforms most other water splitting catalysts.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-018-03429-z

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nitrogen-doped tungsten carbide electrode with belt-like nanostructures exhibits superaerophobicity: bubble contact angle 163.5°, average detached bubble size 5.5 μm, and bubble adhesion force less than 1.2 μN.

    “Han et al. [161] proposed a nitrogen-doped tungsten carbide electrode with belt-like nanostructures which shows superaerophobicity, as shown in first and second image of Fig. 14c. Thanks to the unique array of nano-belts, the electrode exhibits extremely strong superaerophobicity: the bubble contact angle is as high as 163.5°, the average size of detached bubbles is only 5.5 μm, and the bubble”

    From Advances in Surface/Interface Engineering of Under-Water Superaerophobic Electrodes for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction by Manipulating of Bubbles (2026) · cites this paper as [161]

    The Results sections on synthesis and bubble behavior describe an N-doped WC nanobelt array with superaerophobic bubble release. Bubble behavior reports a contact angle of 163° and an almost undetectable adhesion force, but our copy does not state the claimed 163.5°, average detached-bubble size of 5.5 μm, or force threshold of less than 1.2 μN. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Han, N., Yang, K. R., Lu, Z., Li, Y., Xu, W., Gao, T., Cai, Z., Zhang, Y., Batista, V. S., Liu, W., & Sun, X.
Affiliations
  • State Key Laboratory of Chemical Resource Engineering (CN)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Liu, Wen
  • Sun, Xiaoming
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2018-03-02
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
924-924
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2795226894
Cited by
766
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 66 · 2024: 101 · 2023: 90 · 2022: 114 · 2021: 105 · 2020: 114 · 2019: 108 · 2018: 30
FWCI
20.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy (DESC0001059)
  • Northwestern University
  • National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China
  • Office of Science (DESC0001059)
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  • Basic Energy Sciences (DESC0001059, SC0001059)
  • Argonne National Laboratory (DE-SC0001059)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Fuel Cells and Related Materials
Keywords
bifunctional electrocatalysts, hydrogen evolution reaction, oxygen evolution reaction, water splitting, acid electrolysis, non-noble metal catalysts, sulfuric acid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review