Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 619

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ultrafast Electron Transfer Dynamics from Molecular Adsorbates to Semiconductor Nanocrystalline Thin Films

Asbury, John B., Hao, Encai, Wang, Yongqiang, Ghosh, Hirendra N., Lian, Tianquan·2001·The Journal of Physical Chemistry B

Abstract

Interfacial electron transfer (ET) between semiconductor nanomaterials and molecular adsorbates is an important fundamental process that is relevant to applications of these materials. Using femtosecond midinfrared spectroscopy, we have simultaneously measured the dynamics of injected electrons and adsorbates by directly monitoring the mid-IR absorption of electrons in the semiconductor and the change in adsorbate vibrational spectrum, respectively. We report on a series of studies designed to understand how the interfacial ET dynamics depends on the properties of the adsorbates, semiconductors, and their interaction. In Ru(dcbpy) 2 (SCN) 2 (dcbpy = 2,2‘-bipyridine-4,4‘-dicarboxylate) sensitized TiO 2 thin films, 400 nm excitation of the molecule promotes an electron to the metal-to-ligand charge transfer (MLCT) excited state, from which it is injected into TiO 2 . The injection process was characterized by a fast component, with a time constant of <100 fs, and a slower component that is sensitive to sample condition. Similar ultrafast electron injection times were measured in TiO 2 films sensitized by Ru(dcbpy) 2 (X) 2 (X 2 = 2CN - and dcbpy). Electron injection in these systems was found to compete with the vibrational energy relaxation process within the excited state of the molecules, leading to an injection yield that depends on the excited-state redox potential of the adsorbate. The injection rate from Ru(dcbpy) 2 (SCN) 2 to different semiconductors was found to obey the trend TiO 2 > SnO 2 > ZnO, indicating a strong dependence on the nature of the semiconductor. To understand these observations, various factors, such as electronic coupling, density of states, and driving force, that control the interfacial ET rate were examined separately. The effect of electronic coupling on the ET rate was studied in TiO 2 sensitized by three adsorbates, Re(L n )(CO) 3 Cl [L n is a modified dcbpy ligand with n (=0, 1, 3) CH 2 units between the bipyridine and carboxylate groups]. We found that the ET rate decreased with increasing number of CH 2 units (or decreasing electronic coupling strength). The effect of driving force was investigated in Ru(dcbpy) 2 X 2 (X 2 = 2SCN -, 2CN -, and dcbpy) sensitized SnO 2 thin films. In this case, we observed that the ET rate increased with the excited-state redox potential of the adsorbates, agreeing qualitatively with the theoretical prediction for a nonadiabatic interfacial ET process.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jp003485m

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 619

Metadata

Authors
Asbury, J. B., Hao, E., Wang, Y., Ghosh, H. N., & Lian, T.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
Published
2001-03-31
Volume
105
Issue
20
Pages
4545-4557
ISSN
  • 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6106
OpenAlex
W2077536719
Cited by
619
References
1
FWCI
38.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.