The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ultrafast Electron Transfer Dynamics from Molecular Adsorbates to Semiconductor Nanocrystalline Thin Films
Abstract
Interfacial electron transfer (ET) between semiconductor nanomaterials and molecular adsorbates is an important fundamental process that is relevant to applications of these materials. Using femtosecond midinfrared spectroscopy, we have simultaneously measured the dynamics of injected electrons and adsorbates by directly monitoring the mid-IR absorption of electrons in the semiconductor and the change in adsorbate vibrational spectrum, respectively. We report on a series of studies designed to understand how the interfacial ET dynamics depends on the properties of the adsorbates, semiconductors, and their interaction. In Ru(dcbpy) 2 (SCN) 2 (dcbpy = 2,2‘-bipyridine-4,4‘-dicarboxylate) sensitized TiO 2 thin films, 400 nm excitation of the molecule promotes an electron to the metal-to-ligand charge transfer (MLCT) excited state, from which it is injected into TiO 2 . The injection process was characterized by a fast component, with a time constant of <100 fs, and a slower component that is sensitive to sample condition. Similar ultrafast electron injection times were measured in TiO 2 films sensitized by Ru(dcbpy) 2 (X) 2 (X 2 = 2CN - and dcbpy). Electron injection in these systems was found to compete with the vibrational energy relaxation process within the excited state of the molecules, leading to an injection yield that depends on the excited-state redox potential of the adsorbate. The injection rate from Ru(dcbpy) 2 (SCN) 2 to different semiconductors was found to obey the trend TiO 2 > SnO 2 > ZnO, indicating a strong dependence on the nature of the semiconductor. To understand these observations, various factors, such as electronic coupling, density of states, and driving force, that control the interfacial ET rate were examined separately. The effect of electronic coupling on the ET rate was studied in TiO 2 sensitized by three adsorbates, Re(L n )(CO) 3 Cl [L n is a modified dcbpy ligand with n (=0, 1, 3) CH 2 units between the bipyridine and carboxylate groups]. We found that the ET rate decreased with increasing number of CH 2 units (or decreasing electronic coupling strength). The effect of driving force was investigated in Ru(dcbpy) 2 X 2 (X 2 = 2SCN -, 2CN -, and dcbpy) sensitized SnO 2 thin films. In this case, we observed that the ET rate increased with the excited-state redox potential of the adsorbates, agreeing qualitatively with the theoretical prediction for a nonadiabatic interfacial ET process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perspectives on the Physical Chemistry of Semiconductor Nanocrystals
Alivisatos, A. P. (1996) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jp9535506 · Cited by 3,595
Cited by
A review on the visible light active titanium dioxide photocatalysts for environmental applications
Pelaez, M., Nolan, N. T., Pillai, S. C., Seery, M. K., Falaras, P., Kontos, A. G., Dunlop, P. S. M., Hamilton, J. W. J., Byrne, J. A., O'Shea, K., et al. (2012) · Applied Catalysis B: Environmental · doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2012.05.036 · Cited by 4,047
Parameters Influencing the Efficiency of Electron Injection in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells
Koops, S. E., O’Regan, B. C., Barnes, P. R. F., & Durrant, J. R. (2009) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja8091278 · Cited by 601
Theoretical Studies of Photoinduced Electron Transfer in Dye-Sensitized TiO2
Duncan, W. R., & Prezhdo, O. V. (2007) · Annual Review of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.physchem.58.052306.144054 · Cited by 580
ULTRAFAST ELECTRON TRANSFER AT THE MOLECULE-SEMICONDUCTOR NANOPARTICLE INTERFACE
Anderson, N. A., & Lian, T. (2005) · Annual Review of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.physchem.55.091602.094347 · Cited by 490
Self-citationKuriki, R., Matsunaga, H., Nakashima, T., Wada, K., Yamakata, A., Ishitani, O., & Maeda, K. (2016) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.6b01997 · Cited by 482
Linkers for anchoring sensitizers to semiconductor nanoparticles
Galoppini, E. (2004) · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2004.03.016 · Cited by 417
Charge-transfer dynamics studied using resonant core spectroscopies
Brühwiler, P. A., Karis, O., & Mårtensson, N. (2002) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.74.703 · Cited by 372
Finding the Way to Solar Fuels with Dye-Sensitized Photoelectrosynthesis Cells
Brennaman, M. K., Dillon, R. J., Alibabaei, L., Gish, M. K., Dares, C. J., Ashford, D. L., House, R. L., Meyer, G. J., Papanikolas, J. M., & Meyer, T. J. (2016) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.6b06466 · Cited by 369
Tamaki, Y., Furube, A., Murai, M., Hara, K., Katoh, R., & Tachiya, M. (2007) · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · doi:10.1039/b617552j · Cited by 289
Progress on the electrolytes for dye-sensitized solar cells
Wu, J., Lan, Z., Hao, S., Li, P., Lin, J., Huang, M., Fang, L., & Huang, Y. (2008) · Pure and Applied Chemistry · doi:10.1351/pac200880112241 · Cited by 286
Metadata
- Authors
- Asbury, J. B., Hao, E., Wang, Y., Ghosh, H. N., & Lian, T.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2001-03-31
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 4545-4557
- ISSN
- 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6106
- OpenAlex
- W2077536719
- Cited by
- 619
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 38.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.