The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Cluster−Continuum Model for the Calculation of the Solvation Free Energy of Ionic Species
Abstract
A hybrid approach using a combination of explicit solvent molecules and the isodensity polarizable continuum model (IPCM) method is proposed for the calculation of the solvation thermodynamic properties of ions. This model, denominated cluster−continuum, has been applied to the calculation of the solvation free energy of 14 univalent ions, mainly organic species, and compared with the results obtained with the IPCM, polarizable continuum solvation model (PCM), and SM5.42R continuum methods. The average error in our calculated solvation free energies with respect to experimental data is 8.7 kcal mol -1 . However, the great merit of our model resides in the homogeneous treatment for different ions, resulting in a standard deviation of only 2.9 kcal mol -1 for the average error. Our results suggest that the cluster−continuum model must be superior to the IPCM, PCM, and SM5.42R methods for studying chemical reactions in the liquid phase, because these continuum methods present a standard deviation of ∼8 kcal mol -1 for the average error for the species studied in this work. The model can also be used to calculate the solvation entropy of ions. Predicted solvation entropies for five ionic species are in good agreement with available experimental data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Computer Simulation of Liquids
Allen, M. P., & Tildesley, D. J. (2017) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198803195.001.0001 · Cited by 20,945
On the structure and thermodynamics of solvated monoatomic ions using a hybrid solvation model
Topol, I. A., Tawa, G. J., Burt, S. K., & Rashin, A. A. (1999) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.480486 · Cited by 128
Cited by
Quantum Mechanical Continuum Solvation Models
Tomasi, J., Mennucci, B., & Cammi, R. (2005) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr9904009 · Cited by 16,868
Calculation of Solvation Free Energies of Charged Solutes Using Mixed Cluster/Continuum Models
Bryantsev, V. S., Diallo, M. S., & Goddard III, W. A. (2008) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp802665d · Cited by 697
Kelly, C. P., Cramer, C. J., & Truhlar, D. G. (2006) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry A · doi:10.1021/jp055336f · Cited by 445
Thermodynamically dominant hydration structures of aqueous ions
Merchant, S., & Asthagiri, D. (2009) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.3132709 · Cited by 51
Ab Initio Studies of Calcium Carbonate Hydration
Lopez-Berganza, J. A., Diao, Y., Pamidighantam, S., & Espinosa-Marzal, R. M. (2015) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry A · doi:10.1021/acs.jpca.5b09006 · Cited by 26
Assessment of tautomer distribution using the condensed reaction graph approach
Gimadiev, T. R., Madzhidov, T. I., Nugmanov, R. I., Baskin, I. I., Antipin, I. S., & Varnek, A. (2018) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1007/s10822-018-0101-6 · Cited by 25
Ichieda, N., Kasuno, M., Banu, K., Kihara, S., & Nakamatsu, H. (2003) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry A · doi:10.1021/jp0348171 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Pliego, J. R., & Riveros, J. M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2001-07-04
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 30
- Pages
- 7241-7247
- ISSN
- 1089-5639 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5215
- OpenAlex
- W2006668202
- Cited by
- 464
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
