The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Calculation of Solvation Free Energies of Charged Solutes Using Mixed Cluster/Continuum Models
Abstract
We derive a consistent approach for predicting the solvation free energies of charged solutes in the presence of implicit and explicit solvents. We find that some published methodologies make systematic errors in the computed free energies because of the incorrect accounting of the standard state corrections for water molecules or water clusters present in the thermodynamic cycle. This problem can be avoided by using the same standard state for each species involved in the reaction under consideration. We analyze two different thermodynamic cycles for calculating the solvation free energies of ionic solutes: (1) the cluster cycle with an n water cluster as a reagent and (2) the monomer cycle with n distinct water molecules as reagents. The use of the cluster cycle gives solvation free energies that are in excellent agreement with the experimental values obtained from studies of ion-water clusters. The mean absolute errors are 0.8 kcal/mol for H(+) and 2.0 kcal/mol for Cu(2+). Conversely, calculations using the monomer cycle lead to mean absolute errors that are >10 kcal/mol for H(+) and >30 kcal/mol for Cu(2+). The presence of hydrogen-bonded clusters of similar size on the left- and right-hand sides of the reaction cycle results in the cancellation of the systematic errors in the calculated free energies. Using the cluster cycle with 1 solvation shell leads to errors of 5 kcal/mol for H(+) (6 waters) and 27 kcal/mol for Cu(2+) (6 waters), whereas using 2 solvation shells leads to accuracies of 2 kcal/mol for Cu(2+) (18 waters) and 1 kcal/mol for H(+) (10 waters).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lee, C., Yang, W., & Parr, R. G. (1988) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.37.785 · Cited by 100,874
Cited by
Isse, A. A., & Gennaro, A. (2010) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp100402x · Cited by 503
Bryantsev, V. S., Diallo, M. S., van Duin, A. C. T., & Goddard, W. A. (2009) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct800549f · Cited by 403
Self-citationThermodynamically dominant hydration structures of aqueous ions
Merchant, S., & Asthagiri, D. (2009) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.3132709 · Cited by 51
Ivanchenko, O., Mazières, S., Poli, R., Harrisson, S., & Destarac, M. (2022) · Polymer Chemistry · doi:10.1039/d2py01153k · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Bryantsev, V. S., Diallo, M. S., & Goddard III, W. A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-07-23
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 32
- Pages
- 9709-9719
- ISSN
- 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6106
- OpenAlex
- W2036431015
- Cited by
- 697
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Calculation of Solvation Free Energies of Charged Solutes Using Mixed Cluster/Continuum Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jp802665d
- The paper
- Bryantsev, V. S., Diallo, M. S., & Goddard III, W. A. (2008). Calculation of Solvation Free Energies of Charged Solutes Using Mixed Cluster/Continuum Models. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp802665d
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.