The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Immobilization in Surface-Tethered Lipid Vesicles as a New Tool for Single Biomolecule Spectroscopy
Abstract
Single-molecule fluorescence studies of functional biomolecule dynamics rely on the ability to provide biologically relevant experimental conditions. Long measurement times on single molecules require their immobilization, which might modify their dynamics through interactions with the trapping medium, e.g., a glass surface or a polymer gel. In an effort to overcome this problem we have devised a new immobilization technique, based on the confinement of single biomolecules inside 100 nm surface-tethered lipid vesicles. The number of molecules in each vesicle can be accurately determined from fluorescence time traces; under our experimental conditions the number distribution of encapsulated molecules obeys a Poisson distribution with an average occupancy of 0.65 molecules per vesicle. It is further shown that the distribution of fluorescence polarization values of trapped molecules can serve as a sensitive probe for their freedom of motion and thus for the environment they sample inside the liposomes. Polarization distributions are obtained for two vesicle-entrapped labeled proteins, bovine serum albumin and adenylate kinase, and compared with distributions measured for the same proteins directly adsorbed on glass. From the significant relative narrowing of the distributions for encapsulated molecules, it is concluded that their motion within the vesicles is quite similar to free solution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A vesicle bioreactor as a step toward an artificial cell assembly
Noireaux, V., & Libchaber, A. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0408236101 · Cited by 1,152
One SNARE complex is sufficient for membrane fusion
van den Bogaart, G., Holt, M. G., Bunt, G., Riedel, D., Wouters, F. S., & Jahn, R. (2010) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsmb.1748 · Cited by 289
Single-molecule FRET–derived model of the synaptotagmin 1–SNARE fusion complex
Choi, U. B., Strop, P., Vrljic, M., Chu, S., Brunger, A. T., & Weninger, K. R. (2010) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsmb.1763 · Cited by 197
Single-molecule fluorescence spectroscopy maps the folding landscape of a large protein
Pirchi, M., Ziv, G., Riven, I., Cohen, S. S., Zohar, N., Barak, Y., & Haran, G. (2011) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms1504 · Cited by 179
Self-citationKyoung, M., Srivastava, A., Zhang, Y., Diao, J., Vrljic, M., Grob, P., Nogales, E., Chu, S., & Brunger, A. T. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1107900108 · Cited by 154
Search and Subvert: Minimalist Bacterial Phosphatidylinositol-Specific Phospholipase C Enzymes
Roberts, M. F., Khan, H. M., Goldstein, R., Reuter, N., & Gershenson, A. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00208 · Cited by 35
Can DyeCycling break the photobleaching limit in single-molecule FRET?
Vermeer, B., & Schmid, S. (2022) · Nano Research · doi:10.1007/s12274-022-4420-5 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Boukobza, E., Sonnenfeld, A., & Haran, G.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2001-11-02
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 48
- Pages
- 12165-12170
- ISSN
- 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6106
- OpenAlex
- W2158798662
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.