The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Reduction of Cobalt and Iron Corroles and Catalyzed Reduction of CO2
Abstract
The role of cobalt and iron corroles in catalytic CO 2 reduction has been studied. Chemical, electrochemical, and photochemical reductions of the stable metal corroles Ph 3 PCo III (tpfc) (tpfc = 5,10,15-tris(pentafluorophenyl)corrole), ClFe IV (tpfc), and ClFe IV (tdcc) (tdcc = 5,10,15-tris(2,6-dichlorophenyl)corrole) have been carried out in acetonitrile solutions. Stepwise reduction to the [M II (tpfc)] - and [M I (tpfc)] 2- states was observed in all cases. Gradual reduction with sodium amalgam permitted recording of the optical absorption spectra of the various oxidation states and showed that the M I state reacts with CO 2 . Cyclic voltammetry in Ar-saturated acetonitrile solutions permitted determination of the following half-wave potentials: for Ph 3 PCo III (tpfc), 1.11 V, 0.72 V, −0.42 V ( E pc ), −1.44 V, −2.3 V ( E pc ); for ClFe IV (tpfc), 0.44 V, −1.01 V ( E pc ), −1.60 V, −2.2 V ( E pc ); for ClFe IV (tdcc), 0.24 V, −1.18 V ( E pc ), −1.78 V vs SCE with a scan rate of 0.1 V s -1 . Cyclic voltammetry in CO 2 -saturated solutions indicated that the Co I and Fe I complexes react with CO 2 and that the reduced Fe(tdcc) complex is the most efficient electrocatalyst for CO 2 reduction, showing the largest catalytic currents among these corroles. Photochemical reduction in CO 2 -saturated acetonitrile solutions containing p -terphenyl (TP) as a sensitizer and triethylamine (TEA) as a reductant led to production of CO and H 2 . These experiments also show that Fe(tdcc) is more effective than the other corroles as a CO 2 reduction catalyst. The present finding that the M I oxidation states of the cobalt and iron corroles can react with CO 2 is in contrast with the case of the respective porphyrins and phthalocyanines, which do not react with CO 2 until they are reduced beyond the M I state.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A review of catalysts for the electroreduction of carbon dioxide to produce low-carbon fuels
Qiao, J., Liu, Y., Hong, F., & Zhang, J. (2014) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c3cs60323g · Cited by 2,990
Frontiers, Opportunities, and Challenges in Biochemical and Chemical Catalysis of CO 2 Fixation
Appel, A. M., Bercaw, J. E., Bocarsly, A. B., Dobbek, H., DuBois, D. L., Dupuis, M., Ferry, J. G., Fujita, E., Hille, R., Kenis, P. J. A., et al. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr300463y · Cited by 2,193
Self-citationElectro- and Solar-Driven Fuel Synthesis with First Row Transition Metal Complexes
Dalle, K. E., Warnan, J., Leung, J. J., Reuillard, B., Karmel, I. S., & Reisner, E. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00392 · Cited by 912
Boutin, E., Merakeb, L., Ma, B., Boudy, B., Wang, M., Bonin, J., Anxolabéhère-Mallart, E., & Robert, M. (2020) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs00218f · Cited by 423
Aresta, M., Dibenedetto, A., & Quaranta, E. (2016) · Journal of Catalysis · doi:10.1016/j.jcat.2016.04.003 · Cited by 346
Metadata
- Authors
- Grodkowski, J., Neta, P., Fujita, E., Mahammed, A., Simkhovich, L., & Gross, Z.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2002-04-06
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 4772-4778
- ISSN
- 1089-5639 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5215
- OpenAlex
- W2073685285
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reduction of Cobalt and Iron Corroles and Catalyzed Reduction of CO2. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jp013668o
- The paper
- Grodkowski, J., Neta, P., Fujita, E., Mahammed, A., Simkhovich, L., & Gross, Z. (2002). Reduction of Cobalt and Iron Corroles and Catalyzed Reduction of CO2. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp013668o
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.