Cited by 630ZnO doping and propertiesNanowire Synthesis and ApplicationsPhotonic and Optical Devices

Optical Cavity Effects in ZnO Nanowire Lasers and Waveguides

Johnson, Justin C., Yan, Haoquan, Yang, Peidong, Saykally, Richard J.·2003·The Journal of Physical Chemistry B

Abstract

Wide band gap semiconductor nanostructures with near-cylindrical geometry and large dielectric constants exhibit two-dimensional ultraviolet and visible photonic confinement (i.e., waveguiding). Combined with optical gain and suitable resonant feedback, the waveguiding behavior facilitates highly directional lasing at room temperature in controlled-growth nanowires. We have characterized the nanowire emission in detail with high-resolution optical microscopy. The waveguiding behavior of individual zinc oxide (ZnO) nanowires depends on the wavelength of the emitted light and the directional coupling of the photoluminescence (PL) to the emission dipoles of the nanowire. Polarization studies reveal two distinct regimes of PL characterized by coupling to either guided (bound) or radiation modes of the waveguide, the extent of which depends on wire dimensions. Pumping with high pulse energy engenders the transition from spontaneous to stimulated emission, and analysis of the polarization, line width, and line spacing of the laser radiation facilitates identification of the transverse and longitudinal cavity modes and their gain properties. Interpretation of the lasing spectra as a function of pump fluence, with consideration of ZnO material properties and ultrafast excitation dynamics, demonstrates a transition from exciton (fluence < 1 μJ/cm 2 ) to electron−hole plasma dynamics (fluence > 1 μJ/cm 2 ) and gain saturation behavior (fluence > 3 μJ/cm 2 ) modified by the constraints of the nanoscale cylindrical cavity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jp034482n

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Johnson, J. C., Yan, H., Yang, P., & Saykally, R. J.
Affiliations
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
  • Yang, Peidong
  • Saykally, Richard J.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
Published
2003-08-01
Volume
107
Issue
34
Pages
8816-8828
ISSN
  • 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6106
OpenAlex
W1967068087
Cited by
630
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 42
FWCI
20.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › ZnO doping and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Nanowire Synthesis and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Photonic and Optical Devices
Keywords
ZnO nanowires, nanowire lasers, photonic waveguides, optical cavity modes, photoluminescence, polarization, stimulated emission, gain saturation, pump fluence dependence, room-temperature lasing, wide bandgap semiconductors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review