The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biased Sampling of Nonequilibrium Trajectories: Can Fast Switching Simulations Outperform Conventional Free Energy Calculation Methods?
Abstract
We have investigated the maximum computational efficiency of reversible work calculations that change control parameters in a finite amount of time. Because relevant nonequilibrium averages are slow to converge, a bias on the sampling of trajectories can be beneficial. Such a bias, however, can also be employed in conventional methods for computing reversible work, such as thermodynamic integration or umbrella sampling. We present numerical results for a simple one-dimensional model and for a Widom insertion in a soft sphere liquid, indicating that, with an appropriately chosen bias, conventional methods are in fact more efficient. We describe an analogy between nonequilibrium dynamics and mappings between equilibrium ensembles, which suggests that the practical inferiority of fast switching is quite general. Finally, we discuss the relevance of adiabatic invariants in slowly driven Hamiltonian systems for the application of Jarzynski's theorem.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Computer Simulation of Liquids
Allen, M. P., & Tildesley, D. J. (2017) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198803195.001.0001 · Cited by 20,945
T RANSITION P ATH S AMPLING : Throwing Ropes Over Rough Mountain Passes, in the Dark
Bolhuis, P. G., Chandler, D., Dellago, C., & Geissler, P. L. (2002) · Annual Review of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.physchem.53.082301.113146 · Cited by 1,972
Self-citation
Cited by
Computer Simulation of Liquids
Allen, M. P., & Tildesley, D. J. (2017) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198803195.001.0001 · Cited by 20,945
Stochastic thermodynamics, fluctuation theorems and molecular machines
Seifert, U. (2012) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/75/12/126001 · Cited by 3,300
Li, P., Jiang, Y., Hu, Y., Men, Y., Liu, Y., Cai, W., & Chen, S. (2022) · Nature Catalysis · doi:10.1038/s41929-022-00846-8 · Cited by 852
Ribas-Arino, J., & Marx, D. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr200399q · Cited by 448
Zhao, X., & Liu, Y. (2020) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.9b13872 · Cited by 319
Metadata
- Authors
- Oberhofer, H., Dellago, C., & Geissler, P. L.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2005-03-19
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 6902-6915
- ISSN
- 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6106
- OpenAlex
- W2162192337
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.