Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 258

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Biased Sampling of Nonequilibrium Trajectories: Can Fast Switching Simulations Outperform Conventional Free Energy Calculation Methods?

Oberhofer, Harald, Dellago, Christoph, Geissler, Phillip L.·2005·The Journal of Physical Chemistry B

Abstract

We have investigated the maximum computational efficiency of reversible work calculations that change control parameters in a finite amount of time. Because relevant nonequilibrium averages are slow to converge, a bias on the sampling of trajectories can be beneficial. Such a bias, however, can also be employed in conventional methods for computing reversible work, such as thermodynamic integration or umbrella sampling. We present numerical results for a simple one-dimensional model and for a Widom insertion in a soft sphere liquid, indicating that, with an appropriately chosen bias, conventional methods are in fact more efficient. We describe an analogy between nonequilibrium dynamics and mappings between equilibrium ensembles, which suggests that the practical inferiority of fast switching is quite general. Finally, we discuss the relevance of adiabatic invariants in slowly driven Hamiltonian systems for the application of Jarzynski's theorem.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jp044556a

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Oberhofer, H., Dellago, C., & Geissler, P. L.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
Published
2005-03-19
Volume
109
Issue
14
Pages
6902-6915
ISSN
  • 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6106
OpenAlex
W2162192337
Cited by
258
References
2
FWCI
12.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.