The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
(CdSe)ZnS Quantum Dots and Organophosphorus Hydrolase Bioconjugate as Biosensors for Detection of Paraoxon
Abstract
In this paper, we first report a novel biosensor for the detection of paraoxon based on (CdSe)ZnS core-shell quantum dots (QDs) and an organophosphorus hydrolase (OPH) bioconjugate. The OPH was coupled to (CdSe)ZnS core-shell QDs through electrostatic interaction between negatively charged QDs surfaces and the positively charged protein side chain and ending groups (-NH2). Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy showed no significant change in the secondary structure of OPH after the bioconjugation, which indicates that the activity of OPH was preserved. Detectable secondary structure changes were observed by CD spectroscopy when the OPH/QDs bioconjugate was exposed to organophosphorus compounds such as paraoxon. Photoluminescence (PL) spectroscopic study showed that the PL intensity of the OPH/QDs bioconjugate was quenched in the presence of paraoxon. The overall quenching percentage as a function of paraoxon concentration matched very well with the Michaelis-Menten equation. This result indicated that the quenching of PL intensity was caused by the conformational change in the enzyme, which is confirmed by CD measurements. The detection limit of paraoxon concentration using OPH/QDs bioconjugate was about 10(-8) M. Although increasing the OPH molar ratio in the bioconjugates will slightly increase the sensitivity of biosensor, no further increase of sensitivity was achieved when the molar ratio of OPH to QDs was greater than 20 because the surface of QDs was saturated by OPH. These properties make the OPH/QDs bioconjugate a promising biosensor for the detection of organophosphorus compounds.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dabbousi, B. O., Rodriguez-Viejo, J., Mikulec, F. V., Heine, J. R., Mattoussi, H., Ober, R., Jensen, K. F., & Bawendi, M. G. (1997) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp971091y · Cited by 4,229
Cited by
The use of luminescent quantum dots for optical sensing
Costa-Fernández, J. M., Pereiro, R., & Sanz-Medel, A. (2006) · TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.trac.2005.07.008 · Cited by 527
Biosensor technology: recent advances in threat agent detection and medicine
Kirsch, J., Siltanen, C., Zhou, Q., Revzin, A., & Simonian, A. (2013) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c3cs60141b · Cited by 462
Biosensing with Luminescent Semiconductor Quantum Dots
Sapsford, K. E., Pons, T., Medintz, I. L., & Mattoussi, H. (2006) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s6080925 · Cited by 420
Label-free optical biosensors for food and biological sensor applications
Khansili, N., Rattu, G., & Krishna, P. M. (2018) · Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical · doi:10.1016/j.snb.2018.03.004 · Cited by 328
Fluorescence detection of pesticides using quantum dot materials – A review
Nsibande, S. A., & Forbes, P. B. C. (2016) · Analytica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.aca.2016.10.002 · Cited by 283
Metadata
- Authors
- Ji, X., Zheng, J., Xu, J., Rastogi, V. K., Cheng, T.-C., DeFrank, J. J., & Leblanc, R. M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2005-02-10
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3793-3799
- ISSN
- 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6106
- OpenAlex
- W2058847506
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
