Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 355

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Debundling of Single-Walled Nanotubes by Dilution: Observation of Large Populations of Individual Nanotubes in Amide Solvent Dispersions

Giordani, Silvia, Bergin, Shane D., Nicolosi, Valeria, Lebedkin, Sergei, Kappes, Manfred M., Blau, Werner J., Coleman, Jonathan N.·2006·The Journal of Physical Chemistry B

Abstract

Large-scale debundling of single-walled nanotubes has been demonstrated by dilution of nanotube dispersions in the solvent N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP). At high concentrations some very large (approximately 100 s of micrometers) nanotube aggregates exist that can be removed by mild centrifugation. By measurement of the absorbance before and after centrifugation as a function of concentration the relative aggregate and dispersed nanotube concentrations can be monitored. No aggregates are observed below CNT approximately 0.02 mg/mL, suggesting that this can be considered the nanotube dispersion limit in NMP. After centrifugation, the dispersions are stable against sedimentation and further aggregation for a period of weeks at least. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) studies on deposited films reveal that the bundle diameter distribution decreases dramatically as concentration is decreased. Detailed data analysis suggests the presence of an equilibrium bundle number density and that the dispersions self-arrange themselves to always remain close to the dilute/semidilute boundary. A population of individual nanotubes is always observed that increases with decreasing concentration until almost 70% of all dispersed objects are individual nanotubes at a concentration of 0.004 mg/mL. The number density of individual nanotubes peaks at a concentration of approximately 10(-2) mg/mL. Both the mass fraction and the partial concentration of individual nanotubes can also be measured and behave in similar fashion. Comparison of the number density and partial concentration also of individual nanotubes reveals that the individual nanotubes have average molar masses of approximately 700,000 g/mol. The presence of individual nanotubes in NMP dispersion was confirmed by photoluminescence spectroscopy. Concentration dependence of the photoluminescence intensity confirms that the AFM measurements reflect the diameter distributions in situ. In addition, Raman spectroscopy confirms the presence of large quantities of individual nanotubes in the deposited films. Finally, the nature of the solvent properties required for dispersion are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jp0626216

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Giordani, S., Bergin, S. D., Nicolosi, V., Lebedkin, S., Kappes, M. M., Blau, W. J., & Coleman, J. N.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
Published
2006-07-27
Volume
110
Issue
32
Pages
15708-15718
ISSN
  • 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6106
OpenAlex
W2085313197
Cited by
355
References
22
FWCI
22.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.