The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Defining the Role of Excess Electrons in the Surface Chemistry of TiO2
Abstract
Understanding and quantifying the principles governing surface-to-adsorbate charge transfer is of utmost importance because excess electrons in n-type oxides alter significantly surface binding and reactivity. We performed a systematic study using density functional theory (DFT) of the role of excess electrons in rutile TiO 2, which can result from point defects such as oxygen vacancies, bridging row hydroxyls, and interstitial Ti species. These defects create excess electrons within the Ti sublattice which can perform redox chemistry on adsorbates. We show the similarity of these defects in their ability to donate electrons to surface adsorbates, indicating that experimentally distinguishing the nature of the defects may be difficult. We examined the adsorption and reactivity of O 2 in detail and also present a generalization of these findings for a variety of species. A characterization of the redox properties of the surface/adsorbate complex indicates that when the electronegativity of the adsorbate is greater than the surface electronegativity, significant charge transfer from the reduced surface to the absorbate occurs. Surface defects do not participate in significant charge transfer for adsorbates with low electronegativity. Through variations of the U parameter in the DFT+U theory we modulated the position of the defect states in the band gap. Increased stability of the defect states leads to more difficult charge transfer to the adsorbates and a decrease in the adsorption energy. The present study offers insights on requirements with regard to modeling reduced TiO 2 using electronic structure methods and an understanding of how to control the surface reactivity through degree of reduction or defect state location.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Photocatalysis on TiO2 Surfaces: Principles, Mechanisms, and Selected Results
Linsebigler, A. L., Lu, G., & Yates, J. T. (1995) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr00035a013 · Cited by 11,575
A fast and robust algorithm for Bader decomposition of charge density
Henkelman, G., Arnaldsson, A., & Jónsson, H. (2006) · Computational Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2005.04.010 · Cited by 10,723
The surface science of titanium dioxide
Diebold, U. (2003) · Surface Science Reports · doi:10.1016/s0167-5729(02)00100-0 · Cited by 7,944
Surface Science Studies of the Photoactivation of TiO 2 New Photochemical Processes
Thompson, T. L., & Yates, J. T. (2006) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr050172k · Cited by 2,064
Cited by
Fundamentals of TiO2 Photocatalysis: Concepts, Mechanisms, and Challenges
Guo, Q., Zhou, C., Ma, Z., & Yang, X. (2019) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201901997 · Cited by 1,909
Photocatalytic CO 2 Reduction to C2+ Products
Albero, J., Peng, Y., & García, H. (2020) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.0c00478 · Cited by 899
Liu, L., Zhao, H., Andino, J. M., & Li, Y. (2012) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/cs300273q · Cited by 870
Recent development and future prospects of TiO2photocatalysis
Peiris, S., de Silva, H. B., Ranasinghe, K. N., Bandara, S. V., & Perera, I. R. (2021) · Journal of the Chinese Chemical Society · doi:10.1002/jccs.202000465 · Cited by 346
Thermally-driven processes on rutile TiO2(110)-(1×1): A direct view at the atomic scale
Dohnálek, Z., Lyubinetsky, I., & Rousseau, R. (2010) · Progress in Surface Science · doi:10.1016/j.progsurf.2010.03.001 · Cited by 310
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Deskins, N. A., Rousseau, R., & Dupuis, M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2010-03-08
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 5891-5897
- ISSN
- 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-7455
- OpenAlex
- W2047448209
- Cited by
- 214
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 10.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.