The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Molecular Simulation Studies of Separation of CO2/N2, CO2/CH4, and CH4/N2 by ZIFs
Open accessAbstract
In this work, molecular simulations were performed to evaluate the separation performance of two typical zeolitic imidazolate frameworks (ZIFs), ZIF-68 and ZIF-69, for CO 2 /N 2, CO 2 /CH 4, and CH 4 /N 2 mixtures. To do this, we first identified a suitable force field for describing CO 2, N 2, and CH 4 adsorption in ZIFs. On the basis of the validated force field, adsorption selectivities of the three mixtures in these ZIFs were simulated then. The results show that ZIF-69 is more beneficial for separating CO 2 from CO 2 -related mixtures than ZIF-68, mainly due to the presence of chlorine atoms in cbIM linkers in the former for the pressures we have considered. The overall separation performances of these two ZIFs for separating the chosen mixtures are comparable to typical MOFs and zeolites. In addition, this work demonstrates that the electrostatic interactions produced by the frameworks are very important for achieving high adsorption separation selectivities in ZIFs, and ideal adsorbed solution theory (IAST) may be applicable to ZIFs. Furthermore, the effect of water on the separation performance of the two ZIFs was also investigated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water
Jorgensen, W. L., Chandrasekhar, J., Madura, J. D., Impey, R. W., & Klein, M. L. (1983) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.445869 · Cited by 41,298
UFF, a full periodic table force field for molecular mechanics and molecular dynamics simulations
Rappe, A. K., Casewit, C. J., Colwell, K. S., Goddard, W. A., & Skiff, W. M. (1992) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja00051a040 · Cited by 10,557
Selective gas adsorption and separation in metal–organic frameworks
Li, J.-R., Kuppler, R. J., & Zhou, H.-C. (2009) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/b802426j · Cited by 8,932
Metal-organic framework materials as catalysts
Lee, J., Farha, O. K., Roberts, J., Scheidt, K. A., Nguyen, S. T., & Hupp, J. T. (2009) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/b807080f · Cited by 7,969
Exceptional chemical and thermal stability of zeolitic imidazolate frameworks
Park, K. S., Ni, Z., Côté, A. P., Choi, J. Y., Huang, R., Uribe-Romo, F. J., Chae, H. K., O’Keeffe, M., & Yaghi, O. M. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0602439103 · Cited by 7,563
Hybrid porous solids: past, present, future
Férey, G. (2008) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/b618320b · Cited by 5,822
Eddaoudi, M., Moler, D. B., Li, H., Chen, B., Reineke, T. M., O'Keeffe, M., & Yaghi, O. M. (2001) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar000034b · Cited by 5,180
Hydrogen storage in metal–organic frameworks
Murray, L. J., Dincă, M., & Long, J. R. (2009) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/b802256a · Cited by 4,532
High-Throughput Synthesis of Zeolitic Imidazolate Frameworks and Application to CO 2 Capture
Banerjee, R., Phan, A., Wang, B., Knobler, C., Furukawa, H., O'Keeffe, M., & Yaghi, O. M. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1152516 · Cited by 4,205
Thermodynamics of mixed‐gas adsorption
Myers, A. L., & Prausnitz, J. M. (1965) · AIChE Journal · doi:10.1002/aic.690110125 · Cited by 3,775
Cited by
Water Stability and Adsorption in Metal–Organic Frameworks
Burtch, N. C., Jasuja, H., & Walton, K. S. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr5002589 · Cited by 2,730
CO2 Capture and Separations Using MOFs: Computational and Experimental Studies
Yu, J., Xie, L.-H., Li, J.-R., Ma, Y., Seminario, J. M., & Balbuena, P. B. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00626 · Cited by 1,047
Understanding the Effect of Water on CO2 Adsorption
Kolle, J. M., Fayaz, M., & Sayari, A. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00762 · Cited by 523
Yuan, B., Wu, X., Chen, Y., Huang, J., Luo, H., & Deng, S. (2013) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es4000643 · Cited by 305
Direct synthesis of amine-functionalized MIL-101(Cr) nanoparticles and application for CO2 capture
Lin, Y., Kong, C., & Chen, L. (2012) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/c2ra20641b · Cited by 264
A Review of Porous Adsorbents for the Separation of Nitrogen from Natural Gas
Nandanwar, S. U., Corbin, D. R., & Shiflett, M. B. (2020) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.0c02730 · Cited by 96
Performance-Based Screening of Porous Materials for Carbon Capture
Farmahini, A. H., Krishnamurthy, S., Friedrich, D., Brandani, S., & Sarkisov, L. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01266 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, B., & Smit, B.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2010-04-15
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 8515-8522
- ISSN
- 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-7455
- OpenAlex
- W2035814934
- Cited by
- 296
- References
- 55
- FWCI
- 14.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
