Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 335

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Construction of Tubular Molecule Aggregations of Graphdiyne for Highly Efficient Field Emission

Li, Guoxing, Li, Yuliang, Qian, Xuemin, Liu, Huibiao, Lin, Haowei, Chen, Nan, Li, Yongjun·2011·The Journal of Physical Chemistry C

Abstract

Graphdiyne nanotube (GDNT) arrays were prepared through an anodic aluminum oxide template catalyzed by Cu foil. The as-grown nanotubes have a smooth surface with a wall thickness of about 40 nm; after annealing, the GDNTs are about 15 nm. The morphology-dependent field emission properties of graphdiyne arrays were measured and display high performance field emission properties. The turn-on field and threshold field of GDNTs annealed decreased to 4.20 and 8.83 V/μm, respectively.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jp107996f

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Li, G., Li, Y., Qian, X., Liu, H., Lin, H., Chen, N., & Li, Y.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
Published
2011-01-26
Volume
115
Issue
6
Pages
2611-2615
ISSN
  • 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
  • 1932-7455
OpenAlex
W2314674854
Cited by
335
References
0
FWCI
7.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.