The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Solar Photoconversion Using Graphene/TiO2 Composites: Nanographene Shell on TiO2 Core versus TiO2 Nanoparticles on Graphene Sheet
Abstract
Size controlled nanographene oxides (NGOs; <50 nm) were prepared by a two-step oxidation process and NGOs were self-assembled with TiO 2 nanoparticles to form the core/shell structure. Nanosized GO-coated TiO 2 nanoparticles (NGOTs) were then reduced by a photocatalytic process under UV irradiation to obtain graphene-coated TiO 2 . This is clearly different from the typical graphene/TiO 2 composite with the particles-on-a-sheet geometry and is the first study on the core/shell structure of its kind. The physicochemical properties of NGOs and the reduced NGOTs (r-NGOTs) were characterized by various analytical and spectroscopic methods (AFM, FT-IR, XPS, TEM, EELS, etc.). The photocatalytic and photoelectrochemical activities of r-NGOT were compared with a composite of r-GO/TiO 2 that has TiO 2 nanoparticles loaded on a larger graphene sheet (r-LGOT). The photocatalytic production of hydrogen was measured in the aqueous suspension of the composite photocatalyst under UV irradiation (λ > 320 nm), and the photoelectrochemical behaviors were characterized using the electrode coated with the composite photocatalyst. The rates of H 2 production and photocurrent generation were higher with r-NGOT than r-LGOT, which indicates that the presence of r-GO shell on the surface of TiO 2 facilitates the interfacial electron transfer. The direct contact between r-NGO and TiO 2 is maximized in r-NGOT by retarding the charge recombination and accelerating the electron transfer. The geometry of the core/shell structure should be effective in the design of a graphene/TiO 2 composite for solar conversion applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fine Structure Constant Defines Visual Transparency of Graphene
Nair, R. R., Blake, P., Grigorenko, A. N., Novoselov, K. S., Booth, T. J., Stauber, T., Peres, N. M. R., & Geim, A. K. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1156965 · Cited by 9,084
Narrow graphene nanoribbons from carbon nanotubes
Jiao, L., Zhang, L., Wang, X., Diankov, G., & Dai, H. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07919 · Cited by 2,441
Liu, J., Bai, H., Wang, Y., Liu, Z., Zhang, X., & Sun, D. D. (2010) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201001391 · Cited by 776
Luo, J., Cote, L. J., Tung, V. C., Tan, A. T. L., Goins, P. E., Wu, J., & Huang, J. (2010) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja1078943 · Cited by 389
Cited by
Photoinduced charge transfer processes in solar photocatalysis based on modified TiO 2
Park, H., Kim, H.-I., Moon, G.-H., & Choi, W. (2016) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c5ee02575c · Cited by 582
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kim, H.-I., Moon, G.-H., Monllor-Satoca, D., Park, Y., & Choi, W.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2011-12-12
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1535-1543
- ISSN
- 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-7455
- OpenAlex
- W2500403773
- Cited by
- 314
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 11.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Solar Photoconversion Using Graphene/TiO2 Composites: Nanographene Shell on TiO2 Core versus TiO2 Nanoparticles on Graphene Sheet. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jp209035e
- The paper
- Kim, H.-I., Moon, G.-H., Monllor-Satoca, D., Park, Y., & Choi, W. (2012). Solar Photoconversion Using Graphene/TiO2 Composites: Nanographene Shell on TiO2 Core versus TiO2 Nanoparticles on Graphene Sheet. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp209035e
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.