Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 357

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

On the Mechanism of Nonaqueous Li–O2 Electrochemistry on C and Its Kinetic Overpotentials: Some Implications for Li–Air Batteries

McCloskey, Bryan D., Scheffler, Rouven, Speidel, Angela, Girishkumar, Girish, Luntz, Alan C.·2012·The Journal of Physical Chemistry C

Abstract

Quantitative differential electrochemical mass spectrometry and cyclic voltammetry have been combined to probe possible mechanisms and the kinetic overpotentials, responsible for discharge and charge in a Li–O 2 battery, using C as the cathode and an electrolyte based on dimethoxyethane as the solvent. Previous spectroscopy experiments (X-ray diffraction, μRaman, IR, XPS) have shown that Li 2 O 2 is the principle product formed during Li–O 2 discharge using this electrolyte/cathode combination. At all discharge potentials and charge potentials <4.0 V, the observed electrochemistry is ∼2e – /O 2 consumed or produced, also implying that Li 2 O 2 is the dominant thermodynamically stable species formed and consumed in the electrochemistry. No evidence exists at any potential for formation of stable LiO 2 (1e – /O 2 ) or Li 2 O (4e – /O 2 ) during discharge. At charging potentials >4.0 V, the electrochemistry requires significantly more than 2e – /O 2, and we take this as evidence for electrolyte decomposition. We find that sequential concerted (Li + + e – ) ion transfers to/from adsorbed O 2 * and LiO 2 * to produce/consume Li 2 O 2 is the mechanism that is most compatible with these experiments. The kinetic overpotentials are extremely low relative to aqueous O 2 reduction and evolution, and this implies that in principle a discharge–charge Li–O 2 cycle is possible with high voltaic efficiency (∼85%) if electrolyte and cathode stability issues are resolved.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jp306680f

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 357

Metadata

Authors
McCloskey, B. D., Scheffler, R., Speidel, A., Girishkumar, G., & Luntz, A. C.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
Published
2012-11-05
Volume
116
Issue
45
Pages
23897-23905
ISSN
  • 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
  • 1932-7455
OpenAlex
W2050992939
Cited by
357
References
1
FWCI
21.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the Mechanism of Nonaqueous Li–O2 Electrochemistry on C and Its Kinetic Overpotentials: Some Implications for Li–Air Batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jp306680f
The paper
McCloskey, B. D., Scheffler, R., Speidel, A., Girishkumar, G., & Luntz, A. C. (2012). On the Mechanism of Nonaqueous Li–O2 Electrochemistry on C and Its Kinetic Overpotentials: Some Implications for Li–Air Batteries. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp306680f

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.