The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Examining Solid Electrolyte Interphase Formation on Crystalline Silicon Electrodes: Influence of Electrochemical Preparation and Ambient Exposure Conditions
Abstract
Since the potential for alloying lithium with silicon is outside the window of stability of common commercial electrolytes, silicon surfaces form an amorphous solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) under applied potential, which hampers silicon's performance as a lithium-ion battery anode. We have investigated the composition, distribution, and ambient stability of the SEI formed on undoped silicon (001) wafers configured as model electrodes in three different electrochemical conditions using a reduced oxidation interface for transporting air-sensitive samples from a glovebox to an ultra-high-vacuum chamber for X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis. Variable potential cycling and step experiments included linear sweep voltammetry (LSV), cyclic voltammetry (CV), and chronoamperometry (CA). CV and LSV experiments on silicon electrodes scanned from open-circuit voltage to lithiation (3–0.01 V vs Li/Li + ) showed a suppression of carbonate-containing species relative to CA experiments (potential step for 300 s at 0.01 V vs Li/Li + ) in anoxic XPS measurements. When silicon electrodes were exposed to ambient air, SEI layers reacted through both fluorination and combustion processes to produce different SEI product distributions than those prepared under anoxic conditions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Advanced Model for Solid Electrolyte Interphase Electrodes in Liquid and Polymer Electrolytes
Peled, E., Golodnitsky, D., & Ardel, G. (1997) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/1.1837858 · Cited by 1,205
The Surface Chemistry of Lithium Electrodes in Alkyl Carbonate Solutions
Aurbach, D., Ein‐Ely, Y., & Zaban, A. (1994) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/1.2054718 · Cited by 344
Cited by
Electrolytes and Interphases in Li-Ion Batteries and Beyond
Xu, K. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500003w · Cited by 5,566
Michan, A. L., Parimalam, B. S., Leskes, M., Kerber, R. N., Yoon, T., Grey, C. P., & Lucht, B. L. (2016) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b02282 · Cited by 541
Hou, T., Yang, G., Rajput, N. N., Self, J., Park, S.-W., Nanda, J., & Persson, K. A. (2019) · Nano Energy · doi:10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.103881 · Cited by 470
Wang, X., Zhang, M., Alvarado, J., Wang, S., Sina, M., Lu, B., Bouwer, J., Xu, W., Xiao, J., Zhang, J.-G., et al. (2017) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b03606 · Cited by 409
Zhao, J., Lu, Z., Wang, H., Liu, W., Lee, H.-W., Yan, K., Zhuo, D., Lin, D., Liu, N., & Cui, Y. (2015) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.5b04526 · Cited by 369
Silicon Anode Design for Lithium-Ion Batteries: Progress and Perspectives
Franco Gonzalez, A., Yang, N.-H., & Liu, R.-S. (2017) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry C · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b07793 · Cited by 284
Metadata
- Authors
- Schroder, K. W., Celio, H., Webb, L. J., & Stevenson, K. J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-09-05
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- 37
- Pages
- 19737-19747
- ISSN
- 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-7455
- OpenAlex
- W2152465105
- Cited by
- 250
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.