Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 314

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Uptake of H2 and CO2 by Graphene

Ghosh, Anupama, Subrahmanyam, K. S., Krishna, Katla Sai, Datta, Sudipta, Govindaraj, A., Pati, Swapan K., Rao, C. N. R.·2008·The Journal of Physical Chemistry C

Abstract

Graphene samples prepared by the exfoliation of graphitic oxide and conversion of nanodiamond exhibit good hydrogen uptake at 1 atm, 77 K, the uptake going up to 1.7 wt %. The hydrogen uptake varies linearly with the surface area, and the extrapolated value of hydrogen uptake by single-layer graphene works out to be just above 3 wt %. The H 2 uptake at 100 atm and 298 K is found to be 3 wt % or more, suggesting thereby the single-layer graphene would exhibit much higher uptakes. Equally interestingly, the graphene samples prepared by us show high uptake of CO 2, the value reaching up to 35 wt % at 1 atm and 195 K. The first-principles calculations show that hydrogen molecules sit alternately in parallel and perpendicular orientation on the six-membered rings of the graphene. Up to 7.7 wt % of hydrogen can be accommodated on single-layered graphene. CO 2 molecules sit alternatively in a parallel fashion on the rings, giving use to a maximum uptake of 37.93 wt % in single-layer graphene. The presence of more than one layer of graphene in our samples causes a decrease in the H 2 uptake.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jp805802w

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Ghosh, A., Subrahmanyam, K. S., Krishna, K. S., Datta, S., Govindaraj, A., Pati, S. K., & Rao, C. N. R.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
Published
2008-09-11
Volume
112
Issue
40
Pages
15704-15707
ISSN
  • 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
  • 1932-7455
OpenAlex
W113299661
Cited by
314
References
0
FWCI
8.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.