Sorbents for CO2 capture from flue gas—aspects from materials and theoretical chemistry
Abstract
Predictions of future climate change have triggered a search for ways to reduce the release of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. Carbon capture and storage (CCS) assists this goal by reducing carbon dioxide emissions, and CO(2) adsorbents in particular can reduce the costs of CO(2) capture. Here, we review the nanoscale sorbent materials that have been developed and the theoretical basis for their function in CO(2) separation, particularly from N(2)-rich flue gases.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In zeolites and zeolite-type adsorbents, most research has focused on commercial type A, X, and Y zeolites, out of which zeolite 13X (NaX) is considered a benchmark adsorbent for postcombustion CO2 removal.
“In what refers to zeolites and zeolite-type adsorbents (AlPOs, SAPOs, and titanosilicates), most research has focused on commercial type A, X, and Y zeolites, out of which zeolite 13X (NaX) is considered a benchmark adsorbent for postcombustion CO2 removal.331,461,545−547,551,552”
From Zeolites in Adsorption Processes: State of the Art and Future Prospects (2022) · cites this paper as [547]
Separation of CO2 from N2 has been studied on activated and microporous carbons, graphene-based materials, MOFs, amine-functionalized adsorbents, metal oxides and carbonates, zeolites, AlPOs, and SAPOs.
“The separation of CO2 from N2 has been studied on different adsorbents, including activated and microporous carbons, graphene-based materials, MOFs, amine-functionalized adsorbents, metal oxides and carbonates, zeolites, AlPOs, and SAPOs,331−333,543,545−550”
From Zeolites in Adsorption Processes: State of the Art and Future Prospects (2022) · cites this paper as [547]
Cites
Millward, A. R., & Yaghi, O. M. (2005) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja0570032 · Cited by 2,876 · see citing works
On the controllable soft-templating approach to mesoporous silicates
Wan, Y., & Zhao (2007) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr068020s · Cited by 2,371 · see citing works
Reducing the Cost of CO <sub>2</sub> Capture from Flue Gases Using Pressure Swing Adsorption
Ho, M. T., Allinson, G. W., & Wiley, D. E. (2008) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/ie070831e · Cited by 566 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Zeolites in Adsorption Processes: State of the Art and Future Prospects
Pérez-Botella, E., Valencia, S., & Rey, F. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00140 · Cited by 1,126 · see citing works
Sustainable porous carbons with a superior performance for CO2 capture
Sevilla, M., & Fuertes, A. B. (2011) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c0ee00784f · Cited by 1,088 · see citing works
Hedin, N., Andersson, L., Bergström, L., & Yan, J. (2013) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.11.034 · Cited by 424 · see citing works
Self-citationStructuring adsorbents and catalysts by processing of porous powders
Akhtar, F., Andersson, L., Ogunwumi, S., Hedin, N., & Bergström, L. (2014) · Journal of the European Ceramic Society · doi:10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2014.01.008 · Cited by 363 · see citing works
Self-citationValorisation of spent coffee grounds as CO2 adsorbents for postcombustion capture applications
Plaza, M. G., González, A. S., Pevida, C., Pis, J. J., & Rubiera, F. (2012) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.05.028 · Cited by 313 · see citing works
High-performance CO2 sorbents from algae
Sevilla, M., Falco, C., Titirici, M.-M., & Fuertes, A. B. (2012) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/c2ra22552b · Cited by 269 · see citing works
Chemical transformation of CO2 during its capture by waste biomass derived biochars
Xu, X., Kan, Y., Zhao, L., & Cao, X. (2016) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2016.03.013 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
Siegelman, R. L., Milner, P. J., Kim, E. J., Weston, S. C., & Long, J. R. (2019) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c9ee00505f · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Heidari, A., Younesi, H., Rashidi, A., & Ghoreyshi, A. (2014) · Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers · doi:10.1016/j.jtice.2013.06.007 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Carbon Dioxide and Nitrogen Adsorption on Cation-Exchanged SSZ-13 Zeolites
Pham, T. D., Liu, Q., & Lobo, R. F. (2013) · Langmuir · doi:10.1021/la304138z · Cited by 186 · see citing works
Plaza, M. G., García, S., Rubiera, F., Pis, J. J., & Pevida, C. (2011) · Separation and Purification Technology · doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2011.04.015 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Pérez-Botella, E., Palomino, M., Valencia, S., & Rey, F. (2019) · Green Energy and Technology · doi:10.1007/978-981-13-3504-4_7 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hedin, N., Chen, L., & Laaksonen, A.
- Affiliations
- Stockholm University (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Hedin, Niklas
- Venue
- Nanoscale
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2010
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1819
- ISSN
- 2040-3364 (ISSN-L)
- 2040-3372
- OpenAlex
- W2077510398
- Cited by
- 243
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 27
- FWCI
- 51.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nanoscale (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications
- Keywords
- CO2 capture, flue gas, carbon capture and storage, CO2 sorbents, CO2 separation, greenhouse gas emissions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
