The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Physical Theory of Platinum Nanoparticle Dissolution in Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cells
Abstract
The loss of electrochemically active surface area (ECSA) causes severe performance degradation over relevant lifetimes of polymer electrolyte fuel cells. Using a simple physical model, we analyze the interrelations between kinetics of platinum nanoparticle dissolution, evolution of the particle size distribution, and ECSA loss with time. The model incorporates the initial particle radius distribution, and it accounts for kinetic processes involving Pt dissolution, Pt−O formation, and Pt−O dissolution. Employing reasonable simplifying assumptions to the governing equations, a full analytical solution was found under potentiostatic conditions. The simplified model predicts the evolution of the particle radius distribution as well as ECSA loss with time, in close agreement with experimental ex situ and in situ studies. The study indicates that the rates of chemical Pt−O dissolution, driven by the particle size dependence of the cohesive energy, may dominate over electrochemical dissolution. Fitting of the model to experimental data provides an effective surface tension and an effective rate constant of Pt−O dissolution. Implications of the model for the development of strategies to reduce ECSA loss are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Oxygen Reduction on Carbon-Supported Pt−Ni and Pt−Co Alloy Catalysts
Paulus, U. A., Wokaun, A., Scherer, G. G., Schmidt, T. J., Stamenkovic, V., Radmilovic, V., Markovic, N. M., & Ross, P. N. (2002) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp013442l · Cited by 954
Cited by
Ren, P., Pei, P., Li, Y., Wu, Z., Chen, D., & Huang, S. (2020) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2020.100859 · Cited by 737
Highly stable Pt monolayer on PdAu nanoparticle electrocatalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction
Sasaki, K., Naohara, H., Choi, Y., Cai, Y., Chen, W.-F., Liu, P., & Adzic, R. R. (2012) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms2124 · Cited by 419
A Comparative Study on Gold and Platinum Dissolution in Acidic and Alkaline Media
Cherevko, S., Zeradjanin, A. R., Keeley, G. P., & Mayrhofer, K. J. J. (2014) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/2.0881412jes · Cited by 301
Wang, J. X., Ma, C., Choi, Y., Su, D., Zhu, Y., Liu, P., Si, R., Vukmirovic, M. B., Zhang, Y., & Adzic, R. R. (2011) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja204518x · Cited by 270
Kibsgaard, J., Gorlin, Y., Chen, Z., & Jaramillo, T. F. (2012) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja2120162 · Cited by 213
Choi, R., Choi, S., Choi, C. H., Nam, K. M., Woo, S. I., Park, J. T., & Han, S. W. (2013) · Chemistry – A European Journal · doi:10.1002/chem.201203834 · Cited by 98
How theory and simulation can drive fuel cell electrocatalysis
Eslamibidgoli, M. J., Huang, J., Kadyk, T., Malek, A., & Eikerling, M. (2016) · Nano Energy · doi:10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.06.004 · Cited by 83
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Rinaldo, S. G., Stumper, J., & Eikerling, M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2010-03-04
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 5773-5785
- ISSN
- 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-7455
- OpenAlex
- W2061220663
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.