Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 385

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Structures and Energies of Hydrogen-Bonded DNA Base Pairs. A Nonempirical Study with Inclusion of Electron Correlation

Šponer, Jiří, Leszczynski, Jerzy, Hobza, Pavel·1996·The Journal of Physical Chemistry

Abstract

Hydrogen bonding of DNA bases was investigated by reliable nonempirical ab initio calculations. Gradient optimization was carried out on 30 DNA base pairs using the Hartree−Fock (HF) approximation and the 6-31G** basis set of atomic orbitals. The optimizations were performed within C s symmetry. However, the harmonic vibrational analysis indicates that 13 of the studied base pairs are intrinsically nonplanar. Interaction energies of base pairs were then evaluated at the planar optimized geometries with inclusion of the electron correlation energy using the second-order Møller−Plesset (MP2) method. The stabilization energies of the studied base pairs range from −24 to −9 kcal/mol, and the calculated gas phase interaction enthalpies agree well (within 2 kcal/mol) with the available experimental values. The binding energies and molecular structures of the base pairs are not determined solely by the hydrogen bonds, but they are also strongly influenced by the polarity of the monomers and by a wide variety of secondary long-range electrostatic interactions that also involve the hydrogen atoms bonded to ring carbon atoms. The stabilization of the base pairs is dominated by the Hartree−Fock interaction energy. This result confirms that the stability of the base pairs originates in the electrostatic interactions. For weakly bonded base pairs, the correlation interaction energy amounts to as much as 30−40% of the stabilization. For some other base pairs, however, repulsive correlation interaction energy was found. The latter fact is explained as a result of a reduction of the electrostatic attraction upon inclusion of the electron correlation. The empirical London dispersion energy does not reproduce the correlation interaction energy. For the sake of comparison, results of a first gradient optimization for a DNA base pair at a correlated level (CC base pair, MP2/6-31G** level) are reported. In addition, the ability of the economical density functional theory (DFT) method to reproduce the ab initio data was investigated. The DFT method with present functionals is not suitable to consistently study the whole range of the DNA base interactions. However, it gives good estimates of interaction energies at the reference HF/6-31G** geometries.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jp952760f

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 385

Metadata

Authors
Šponer, J., Leszczynski, J., & Hobza, P.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry
Published
1996-01-01
Volume
100
Issue
5
Pages
1965-1974
ISSN
  • 0022-3654 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-5740
OpenAlex
W2071884305
Cited by
385
References
2
FWCI
7.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.