The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Parametrized Models of Aqueous Free Energies of Solvation Based on Pairwise Descreening of Solute Atomic Charges from a Dielectric Medium
Abstract
The pairwise descreening approximation provides a rapid computational algorithm for the evaluation of solute shape effects on electrostatic contributions to solvation energies. In this article we show that solvation models based on this algorithm are useful for predicting free energies of solvation across a wide range of solute functionalities, and we present six new general parametrizations of aqueous free energies of solvation based on this approach. The first new model is based on SM2-type atomic surface tensions, the AM1 model for the solute, and Mulliken charges. The next two new models are based on SM5-type surface tensions, either the AM1 or the PM3 model for the solute, and Mulliken charges. The final three models are based on SM5-type atomic surface tensions and are parametrized using the AM1 or the PM3 model for the solute and CM1 charges. The parametrizations are based on experimental data for a set of 219 neutral solute molecules containing a wide range of organic functional groups and the atom types H, C, N, O, F, P, S, Cl, Br, and I and on data for 42 ions containing the same elements. The average errors relative to experiment are slightly better than previous methods, but more significantly the computational cost is reduced for large molecules, and the methods are well suited to using analytic derivatives.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hermann, R. B. (1972) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/j100663a023 · Cited by 700
Cited by
The Amber biomolecular simulation programs
Case, D. A., Cheatham, T. E., Darden, T., Gohlke, H., Luo, R., Merz, K. M., Onufriev, A., Simmerling, C., Wang, B., & Woods, R. J. (2005) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.20290 · Cited by 9,535
Onufriev, A., Bashford, D., & Case, D. A. (2004) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.20033 · Cited by 2,507
Sun, H., Li, Y., Tian, S., Xu, L., & Hou, T. (2014) · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · doi:10.1039/c4cp01388c · Cited by 738
An improved protein decoy set for testing energy functions for protein structure prediction
Tsai, J., Bonneau, R., Morozov, A. V., Kuhlman, B., Rohl, C. A., & Baker, D. (2003) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.10454 · Cited by 158
Corrada, D., Soshilov, A. A., Denison, M. S., & Bonati, L. (2016) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004981 · Cited by 43
Kurkcuoglu, Z., & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. (2020) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.25802 · Cited by 37
Elder, L. H., & Onufriev, A. V. (2025) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.5c02263 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Hawkins, G. D., Cramer, C. J., & Truhlar, D. G.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1996-01-01
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 51
- Pages
- 19824-19839
- ISSN
- 0022-3654 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-5740
- OpenAlex
- W1980933072
- Cited by
- 884
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.