Cited by 43Protein Structure and DynamicsToxic Organic Pollutants ImpactComputational Drug Discovery Methods

Deciphering Dimerization Modes of PAS Domains: Computational and Experimental Analyses of the AhR:ARNT Complex Reveal New Insights Into the Mechanisms of AhR Transformation

Open access
Corrada, Dario, Soshilov, Anatoly A., Denison, Michael S., Bonati, Laura·2016·PLOS Computational Biology

Abstract

The Aryl hydrocarbon Receptor (AhR) is a transcription factor that mediates the biochemical response to xenobiotics and the toxic effects of a number of environmental contaminants, including dioxins. Recently, endogenous regulatory roles for the AhR in normal physiology and development have also been reported, thus extending the interest in understanding its molecular mechanisms of activation. Since dimerization with the AhR Nuclear Translocator (ARNT) protein, occurring through the Helix-Loop-Helix (HLH) and PER-ARNT-SIM (PAS) domains, is needed to convert the AhR into its transcriptionally active form, deciphering the AhR:ARNT dimerization mode would provide insights into the mechanisms of AhR transformation. Here we present homology models of the murine AhR:ARNT PAS domain dimer developed using recently available X-ray structures of other bHLH-PAS protein dimers. Due to the different reciprocal orientation and interaction surfaces in the different template dimers, two alternative models were developed for both the PAS-A and PAS-B dimers and they were characterized by combining a number of computational evaluations. Both well-established hot spot prediction methods and new approaches to analyze individual residue and residue-pairwise contributions to the MM-GBSA binding free energies were adopted to predict residues critical for dimer stabilization. On this basis, a mutagenesis strategy for both the murine AhR and ARNT proteins was designed and ligand-dependent DNA binding ability of the AhR:ARNT heterodimer mutants was evaluated. While functional analysis disfavored the HIF2α:ARNT heterodimer-based PAS-B model, most mutants derived from the CLOCK:BMAL1-based AhR:ARNT dimer models of both the PAS-A and the PAS-B dramatically decreased the levels of DNA binding, suggesting this latter model as the most suitable for describing AhR:ARNT dimerization. These novel results open new research directions focused at elucidating basic molecular mechanisms underlying the functional activity of the AhR.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004981

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Modeling studies on the AhR:ARNT dimer, based on the HIF-2α:ARNT template, predicted that the Fα/Gβ site may be involved in the dimerization interface.

    “our modeling studies on the AhR:ARNT dimer, based on the HIF-2α:ARNT template, predicted that the Fα/Gβ site may be involved in the dimerization interface47,48.”

    From Modeling the binding of diverse ligands within the Ah receptor ligand binding domain (2019) · cites this paper as [47]

    The Results (Template selection and modeling strategies; Characterization of the dimerization interfaces, page unavailable) describe an AhR:ARNT model based on the HIF-2α:ARNT structure and place its proposed interface at the β-sheets of both domains. They do not identify an Fα/Gβ site as part of that interface. The Discussion further says the authors’ data refute the HIF-2α:ARNT-based model. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Corrada, D., Soshilov, A. A., Denison, M. S., & Bonati, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
Corresponding author
Bonati, Laura
Venue
PLOS Computational Biology
Published
2016-06-13
Volume
12
Issue
6
Pages
e1004981
ISSN
  • 1553-734X (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-7358
OpenAlex
W2437960705
Cited by
43
References
61
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2
FWCI
1.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Computational Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R01ES07685)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
aryl hydrocarbon receptor, ARNT, PAS domain, protein dimerization, helix-loop-helix, bHLH-PAS proteins, homology modeling, binding free energy, MM-GBSA, hot spot prediction, mutagenesis, DNA binding, Clock/BMAL1, transcription factor activation
MeSH terms
Protein Domains, Humans, Models, Molecular, Mutation, Receptors, Aryl Hydrocarbon, Computational Biology, Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Nuclear Translocator

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review