The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Creating Chiral Surfaces for Enantioselective Heterogeneous Catalysis: R,R-Tartaric Acid on Cu(110)
Abstract
One of the most successful ways of inducing enantioselectivity in a heterogeneous catalytic system is by the adsorption of chiral “modifier” molecules on the reactive metal surface. However, little is known about the nature of the active sites present on the modified metal surface and how such modifiers bestow chirality to an achiral metal surface. In this paper we report the behavior of R, R -tartaric acid adsorption on a Cu(110) surface using high-resolution surface analytical techniques. R, R -Tartaric acid is known to be an extremely successful modifier molecule for the enantioselective hydrogenation of methyl acetoacetate, the simplest β-keto ester, to the R -enantiomer of the product molecule methyl 3-hydroxybutyrate. A combination of low-energy electron diffraction (LEED), scanning tunneling microscopy (STM), and Fourier transform reflection−absorption infrared spectroscopy (FT-RAIRS) techniques has allowed us to demonstrate that a complicated adsorption phase diagram exists for this system. A rich variety of ordered overlayer structures are produced, in which preferred molecular forms, bonding and orientations of the chiral molecules are adopted, dependent on coverage, temperature and time. These different adlayers will clearly play a different role in the enantioselective reaction. Of particular interest is the fact that under certain conditions, the 2-dimensional order of the R, R -tartaric acid adlayer destroys all symmetry elements at the surface, leading to the creation of extended chiral surfaces! Such chiral surfaces may be an important factor in defining the active site in heterogeneous enantioselective reactions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Asymmetric Catalysis at Chiral Metal Surfaces
Mallat, T., Orglmeister, E., & Baiker, A. (2007) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr0683663 · Cited by 592
Extended surface chirality from supramolecular assemblies of adsorbed chiral molecules
Ortega Lorenzo, M., Baddeley, C. J., Muryn, C., & Raval, R. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35006031 · Cited by 549
Self-citationGolmohammadzadeh, R., Faraji, F., & Rashchi, F. (2018) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.04.024 · Cited by 478
Zaera, F. (2014) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c3cs60374a · Cited by 324
Molecular chirality at surfaces
Ernst, K. (2012) · physica status solidi (b) · doi:10.1002/pssb.201248188 · Cited by 260
Chirality in adsorption on solid surfaces
Zaera, F. (2017) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c7cs00367f · Cited by 172
Metadata
- Authors
- Lorenzo, M. O., Haq, S., Bertrams, T., Murray, P., Raval, R., & Baddeley, C. J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1999-11-11
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 48
- Pages
- 10661-10669
- ISSN
- 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6106
- OpenAlex
- W2031395081
- Cited by
- 231
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.