Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 176

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

How Structural Features Influence the Biomembrane Permeability of Peptides

Burton, Philip S., Conradi, Robert A., Ho, Norman F.H., Hilgers, Allen R., Borchardt, Ronald T.·1996·Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences

Abstract

Successful drug development requires not only optimization of specific and potent pharmacological activity at the target site, but also efficient delivery to that site. Many promising new peptides with novel therapeutic potential for the treatment of AIDS, cardiovascular diseases, and CNS disorders have been identified, yet their clinical utility has been limited by delivery problems. Along with metabolism, a major factor contributing to the poor bioavailability of peptides is thought to be inefficient transport across cell membranes. At the present time, the reasons for this poor transport are poorly understood. To explore this problem, we have designed experiments focused on determining the relationship between peptide structure and peptide transport across various biological membranes both in vitro and in vivo. Briefly, peptides that varied systematically in chain length, lipophilicity, and amide bond number were prepared. Permeability results with these solutes support a model in which the principal determinant of peptide transport is the energy required to desolvate the polar amides in the peptide for the peptide to enter and diffuse across the cell membrane. Further impacting on peptide permeability is the presence of active, secretory transport systems present in the apical membrane of intestinal epithelial and brain endothelial cells. In Caco-2 cell monolayers, a model of the human intestinal mucosa, this pathway displayed substrate specificity, saturation, and inhibition. Similar results have been shown in vivo in both rat intestinal and blood-brain barrier absorption models. The presence of such systems serves as an additional transport barrier by returning a fraction of absorbed peptide back to the lumen.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/js960067d

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 176

Metadata

Authors
Burton, P. S., Conradi, R. A., Ho, N. F. H., Hilgers, A. R., & Borchardt, R. T.
Venue
Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
Published
1996-12
Volume
85
Issue
12
Pages
1336-1340
ISSN
0022-3549 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2077957449
Cited by
176
References
0
FWCI
3.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How Structural Features Influence the Biomembrane Permeability of Peptides. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/js960067d
The paper
Burton, P. S., Conradi, R. A., Ho, N. F. H., Hilgers, A. R., & Borchardt, R. T. (1996). How Structural Features Influence the Biomembrane Permeability of Peptides. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1021/js960067d

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.