The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sulfur Speciation in Li–S Batteries Determined by Operando X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy
Abstract
Among the most challenging issues in electrochemical energy storage is developing insightful in situ probes of redox processes for a working cell. This is particularly true for cells that operate on the basis of chemical transformations such as Li–S and Li–O 2, where the factors that govern capacity and cycling stability are difficult to access owing to the amorphous nature of the intermediate species. Here, we investigate cathodes for the Li–S cell comprised of sulfur-imbibed robust spherical carbon shells with tailored porosity that exhibit excellent cycling stability. Their highly regular nanoscale dimensions and thin carbon shells allow highly uniform electrochemical response and further enable direct monitoring of sulfur speciation within the cell over the entire redox range by operando X-ray absorption spectroscopy on the S K-edge. The results reveal the first detailed evidence of the mechanisms of sulfur redox chemistry on cycling, showing how sulfur fraction (under-utilization) and sulfide precipitation impact capacity. Such information is critical for promoting improvements in Li–S batteries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Li-O2 and Li-S batteries with high energy storage
Bruce, P. G., Freunberger, S. A., Hardwick, L. J., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2012) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat3191 · Cited by 9,479
Cited by
Rechargeable Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Manthiram, A., Fu, Y., Chung, S.-H., Zu, C., & Su, Y.-S. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500062v · Cited by 4,665
A highly efficient polysulfide mediator for lithium–sulfur batteries
Liang, X., Hart, C., Pang, Q., Garsuch, A., Weiss, T., & Nazar, L. F. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms6682 · Cited by 2,062
Self-citationReview on High‐Loading and High‐Energy Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Peng, H., Huang, J., Cheng, X., & Zhang, Q. (2017) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201700260 · Cited by 1,746
Nanostructured Metal Oxides and Sulfides for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Liu, X., Huang, J., Zhang, Q., & Mai, L. (2017) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201601759 · Cited by 1,616
Powering Lithium–Sulfur Battery Performance by Propelling Polysulfide Redox at Sulfiphilic Hosts
Yuan, Z., Peng, H.-J., Hou, T.-Z., Huang, J.-Q., Chen, C.-M., Wang, D.-W., Cheng, X.-B., Wei, F., & Zhang, Q. (2016) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04166 · Cited by 1,438
Metadata
- Authors
- Cuisinier, M., Cabelguen, P.-E., Evers, S., He, G., Kolbeck, M., Garsuch, A., Bolin, T., Balasubramanian, M., & Nazar, L. F.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2013-09-16
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 3227-3232
- ISSN
- 1948-7185 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2316548329
- Cited by
- 550
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 24.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.