The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Model for Contact Angles and Hysteresis on Rough and Ultraphobic Surfaces
Abstract
Very rough surfaces can suspend small water drops, prevent wetting, and cause contact angles to approach 180°. A criterion based on contact line density is proposed for predicting the conditions that produce these ultrahydrophobic surfaces, where, above a critical value, drops are suspended by asperities. Critical values of the contact line density can be calculated from contact angles, asperity shape, and information about the contact liquid, such as density and surface tension. The criterion was found to correctly predict suspension for several model surfaces prepared by lithography techniques. Apparent contact angles from suspended and collapsed drops also were modeled by accounting for rough edges and employing a linear average of contact angle along the perimeter of the drop, rather than an area average of cosine. This linear model suggests that, for suspended drops, both advancing and receding angles should increase. Alternatively, for drops that have collapsed over surface asperities, advancing contact angles should increase, while receding angles should decrease. These findings agree with the observations of a number of investigators that have suggested that asperity height may be less important than asperity shape in determining wetting.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wettability of porous surfaces
Cassie, A. B. D., & Baxter, S. (1944) · Transactions of the Faraday Society · doi:10.1039/tf9444000546 · Cited by 13,807
RESISTANCE OF SOLID SURFACES TO WETTING BY WATER
Wenzel, R. N. (1936) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ie50320a024 · Cited by 13,316
Cited by
Wetting States and Departure Diameters of Bubbles on Micro-/Nanostructured Surfaces
Li, J., Gong, S., Zhang, L., Cheng, P., Ma, X., & Hong, F. (2022) · Langmuir · doi:10.1021/acs.langmuir.1c03212 · Cited by 36
Mohseni, M., Lahiri, S. K., Nadaraja, A. V., Sundararaj, U., & Golovin, K. (2023) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2023.144726 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Extrand, C. W.
- Venue
- Langmuir
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2002-09-04
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 7991-7999
- ISSN
- 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5827
- OpenAlex
- W2036092043
- Cited by
- 631
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Model for Contact Angles and Hysteresis on Rough and Ultraphobic Surfaces. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/la025769z
- The paper
- Extrand, C. W. (2002). Model for Contact Angles and Hysteresis on Rough and Ultraphobic Surfaces. Langmuir. https://doi.org/10.1021/la025769z
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.