Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 170

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Controlling Polymer Adhesion with “Pancakes”

Crosby, Alfred J., Hageman, Mark, Duncan, Andrew·2005·Langmuir

Abstract

Topographical patterns are used to selectively tune the adhesion of polymers. Although nature has provided guidance, relatively little is known of how topographic patterns can be intelligently used not only to enhance adhesion but, more importantly, to tune adhesion. We demonstrate that properly designed, low-aspect-ratio posts can alter adhesion from 20% to 400% the value of conventional adhesion descriptors for nonpatterned interfaces. This control is not related to the magnitude of interfacial area but, rather, to altering the local separation processes at an interface by geometry. We establish general relationships that govern the interaction between material properties, pattern length scales, and the control of adhesion. These relationships provide insight into the mechanisms of adhesion for examples in nature, such as the gecko, while also providing concrete guidance for the future design of "smart" adhesives and coatings with nanoscale patterns.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/la051721k

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 170

Metadata

Authors
Crosby, A. J., Hageman, M., & Duncan, A.
Venue
Langmuir
Published
2005-11-03
Volume
21
Issue
25
Pages
11738-11743
ISSN
  • 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5827
OpenAlex
W2037486939
Cited by
170
References
1
FWCI
26.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.