Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 408

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Storage and Separation of CO2 and CH4 in Silicalite, C168 Schwarzite, and IRMOF-1: A Comparative Study from Monte Carlo Simulation

Babarao, Ravichandar, Hu, Zhongqiao, Jiang, Jianwen, Chempath, Shaji, Sandler, Stanley I.·2007·Langmuir

Abstract

Storage of pure CO2 and CH4 and separation of their binary mixture in three different classes of nanostructured adsorbents--silicalite, C168 schwarzite, and IRMOF-1--have been compared at room temperature using atomistic simulation. CH4 is represented as a spherical Lennard-Jones molecule, and CO2 is represented as a rigid linear molecule with a quadrupole moment. For pure component adsorption, CO2 is preferentially adsorbed than CH4 in all the three adsorbents over the pressure range under this study, except in C168 schwarzite at high pressures. The simulated adsorption isotherms and isosteric heats match closely with available experimental data. A dual-site Langmuir-Freundlich equation is used to fit the isotherms satisfactorily. Compared to silicalite and C168 schwarzite, the gravimetric adsorption capacity of pure CH4 and CO2 separately in IRMOF-1 is substantially larger. This implies that IRMOF-1 might be a potential storage medium for CH4 and CO2. For adsorption from an equimolar binary mixture, CO2 is preferentially adsorbed in all three adsorbents. Predictions of mixture adsorption with the ideal-adsorbed solution theory on the basis of only pure component adsorption agree well with simulation results. Though IRMOF-1 has a significantly higher adsorption capacity than silicalite and C168 schwarzite, the adsorption selectivity of CO2 over CH4 is found to be similar in all three adsorbents.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/la062289p

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 37 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Babarao, R., Hu, Z., Jiang, J., Chempath, S., & Sandler, S. I.
Venue
Langmuir
Published
2006-11-17
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
659-666
ISSN
  • 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5827
OpenAlex
W2019293828
Cited by
408
References
37
FWCI
14.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.