The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of Oxidation on the Magnetization of Nanoparticulate Magnetite
Abstract
Synthetic nanomagnetite has been suggested as a potential reactant for the in situ treatment of contaminated groundwater. Although the application of magnetite nanoparticles for environmental remediation is promising, a full understanding of particle reactivity has been deterred by the propensity of the nanoparticles to aggregate and become colloidally unstable. Attractive magnetic interactions between particles are partially responsible for their aggregation. In this study, we characterized the magnetic behavior of magnetite by determining the saturation magnetization, coercivity, remanent magnetization, susceptibility, and blocking temperature of synthetic magnetite using a superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID). We show how these properties vary in the presence of surface-associated solutes such as tetramethylammonium (TMA(+)) and ferrous (Fe(II)) cations. More importantly, because magnetite readily reacts with O(2) to produce maghemite, we analyzed the effect of oxidation on the magnetic properties of the particles. Because maghemite has a reported magnetic saturation that is less than that of magnetite, we hypothesized that oxidation would decrease the magnitude of the magnetic attractive force between adjacent particles. The presence of TMA(+) and Fe(II) caused a change in the magnetic properties of magnetite potentially because of alterations in its crystalline order. Magnetite oxidation caused a decrease in saturation magnetization, resulting in less significant magnetic interactions between particles. Oxidation, therefore, could lead to the decreased aggregation of magnetite nanoparticles and a potential enhancement of their colloidal stability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lovley, D. R., & Phillips, E. J. P. (1988) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.54.6.1472-1480.1988 · Cited by 2,395
Cited by
Rajput, S., Pittman, C. U., & Mohan, D. (2016) · Journal of Colloid and Interface Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2015.12.008 · Cited by 746
Iron Oxide Nanoparticles for Magnetically-Guided and Magnetically-Responsive Drug Delivery
Estelrich, J., Escribano, E., Queralt, J., & Busquets, M. (2015) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms16048070 · Cited by 532
Fang, G.-D., Dionysiou, D. D., Al-Abed, S. R., & Zhou, D.-M. (2013) · Applied Catalysis B: Environmental · doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2012.09.042 · Cited by 512
Liu, C.-H., Chuang, Y.-H., Chen, T.-Y., Tian, Y., Li, H., Wang, M.-K., & Zhang, W. (2015) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b00381 · Cited by 398
Wagner, S., Gondikas, A., Neubauer, E., Hofmann, T., & von der Kammer, F. (2014) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201405050 · Cited by 332
Metadata
- Authors
- Rebodos, R. L., & Vikesland, P. J.
- Venue
- Langmuir
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2010-09-29
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 16745-16753
- ISSN
- 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5827
- OpenAlex
- W2328692073
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.