Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 310

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Complexity behind CO2 Capture on NH2-MIL-53(Al)

Open access
Stavitski, Eli, Pidko, Evgeny A., Couck, Sarah, Remy, Tom, Hensen, Emiel J. M., Weckhuysen, Bert M., Denayer, Joeri, Gascon, Jorge, Kapteijn, Freek·2011·Langmuir

Abstract

Some Metal Organic Frameworks (MOFs) show excellent performance in extracting carbon dioxide from different gas mixtures. The origin of their enhanced separation ability is not clear yet. Herein, we present a combined experimental and theoretical study of the amino-functionalized MIL-53(Al) to elucidate the mechanism behind its unusual high efficiency in CO(2) capture. Spectroscopic and DFT studies point out only an indirect role of amine moieties. In contrast to other amino-functionalized CO(2) sorbents, no chemical bond between CO(2) and the NH(2) groups of the structure is formed. We demonstrate that the functionalization modulates the "breathing" behavior of the material, that is, the flexibility of the framework and its capacity to alter the structure upon the introduction of specific adsorbates. The absence of strong chemical interactions with CO(2) is of high importance for the overall performance of the adsorbent, since full regeneration can be achieved within minutes under very mild conditions, demonstrating the high potential of this type of adsorbents for PSA like systems.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/la1045207

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 310

Metadata

Authors
Stavitski, E., Pidko, E. A., Couck, S., Remy, T., Hensen, E. J. M., Weckhuysen, B. M., Denayer, J., Gascon, J., & Kapteijn, F.
Venue
Langmuir
Published
2011-03-04
Volume
27
Issue
7
Pages
3970-3976
ISSN
  • 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5827
OpenAlex
W2172269778
Cited by
310
References
2
FWCI
19.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.