The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Enhanced carbon dioxide capture upon incorporation of N,N′-dimethylethylenediamine in the metal–organic framework CuBTTri
Abstract
High capacity, high selectivity, and low-cost regeneration conditions are the most important criteria by which new adsorbents for post-combustion carbon dioxide capture will be judged. The incorporation of N,N′-dimethylethylenediamine (mmen) into H3[(Cu4Cl)3(BTTri)8 (CuBTTri; H3BTTri = 1,3,5-tri(1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)benzene), a water-stable, triazolate-bridged framework, is shown to drastically enhance CO2 adsorption, resulting in one of the best performing metal–organic frameworks for CO2 separation reported to date. High porosity was maintained despite stoichiometric attachment of mmen to the open metal sites of the framework, resulting in a BET surface area of 870 m2 g−1. At 25 °C under a 0.15 bar CO2/0.75 bar N2 mixture, mmen-CuBTTri adsorbs 2.38 mmol CO2 g−1 (9.5 wt%) with a selectivity of 327, as determined using Ideal Adsorbed Solution Theory (IAST). The high capacity and selectivity are consequences of the exceptionally large isosteric heat of CO2 adsorption, calculated to be −96 kJ mol−1 at zero coverage. Infrared spectra support chemisorption between amines and CO2 as one of the primary mechanisms of uptake. Despite the large initial heat of adsorption, the CO2 uptake was fully reversible and the framework could be easily regenerated at 60 °C, enabling a cycling time of just 27 min with no loss of capacity over the course of 72 adsorption/desorption cycles.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Advances in CO2 capture technology—The U.S. Department of Energy's Carbon Sequestration Program
Figueroa, J. D., Fout, T., Plasynski, S., McIlvried, H., & Srivastava, R. D. (2008) · International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control · doi:10.1016/s1750-5836(07)00094-1 · Cited by 2,281
Sumida, K., Horike, S., Kaye, S. S., Herm, Z. R., Queen, W. L., Brown, C. M., Grandjean, F., Long, G. J., Dailly, A., & Long, J. R. (2010) · Chemical Science · doi:10.1039/c0sc00179a · Cited by 347
Self-citationFunctionalized MOFs for Enhanced CO2 Capture
Torrisi, A., Bell, R. G., & Mellot-Draznieks, C. (2010) · Crystal Growth & Design · doi:10.1021/cg100646e · Cited by 293
Cited by
Carbon capture and storage (CCS): the way forward
Bui, M., Adjiman, C. S., Bardow, A., Anthony, E. J., Boston, A., Brown, S., Fennell, P. S., Fuss, S., Galindo, A., Hackett, L. A., et al. (2018) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c7ee02342a · Cited by 4,374
Kökçam-Demir, Ü., Goldman, A., Esrafili, L., Gharib, M., Morsali, A., Weingart, O., & Janiak, C. (2020) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c9cs00609e · Cited by 895
Metal–organic frameworks based on flexible ligands (FL-MOFs): structures and applications
Lin, Z.-J., Lü, J., Hong, M., & Cao, R. (2014) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c3cs60483g · Cited by 874
A review on solid adsorbents for carbon dioxide capture
Lee, S.-Y., & Park, S.-J. (2015) · Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jiec.2014.09.001 · Cited by 707
Understanding the Effect of Water on CO2 Adsorption
Kolle, J. M., Fayaz, M., & Sayari, A. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00762 · Cited by 523
Metadata
- Authors
- McDonald, T. M., D'Alessandro, D. M., Krishna, R., & Long, J. R.
- Venue
- Chemical Science
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2011
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2022
- ISSN
- 2041-6520 (ISSN-L)
- 2041-6539
- OpenAlex
- W2101187042
- Cited by
- 522
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 82.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enhanced carbon dioxide capture upon incorporation of N,N′-dimethylethylenediamine in the metal–organic framework CuBTTri. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c1sc00354b
- The paper
- McDonald, T. M., D'Alessandro, D. M., Krishna, R., & Long, J. R. (2011). Enhanced carbon dioxide capture upon incorporation of N,N′-dimethylethylenediamine in the metal–organic framework CuBTTri. Chemical Science. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1sc00354b
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.