Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 205

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Impact of Nanoscale Roughness of Titanium Thin Film Surfaces on Bacterial Retention

Ivanova, Elena P., Truong, Vi Khanh, Wang, James Y., Berndt, Christopher C., Jones, Robert T., Yusuf, Iman I., Peake, Ian, Schmidt, Heinrich W., Fluke, Christopher, Barnes, David, Crawford, Russell J.·2010·Langmuir

Abstract

Two human pathogenic bacteria, Staphylococcus aureus CIP 68.5 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 9025, were adsorbed onto surfaces containing Ti thin films of varying thickness to determine the extent to which nanoscale surface roughness influences the extent of bacterial attachment. A magnetron sputter thin film system was used to deposit titanium films with thicknesses of 3, 12, and 150 nm on glass substrata with corresponding surface roughness parameters of R(q) 1.6, 1.2, and 0.7 nm (on a 4 microm x 4 microm scanning area). The chemical composition, wettability, and surface architecture of titanium thin films were characterized using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, contact angle measurements, atomic force microscopy, three-dimensional interactive visualization, and statistical approximation of the topographic profiles. Investigation of the dynamic evolution of the Ti thin film topographic parameters indicated that three commonly used parameters, R(a), R(q), and R(max), were insufficient to effectively characterize the nanoscale rough/smooth surfaces. Two additional parameters, R(skw) and R(kur), which describe the statistical distributions of roughness character, were found to be useful for evaluating the surface architecture. Analysis of bacterial retention profiles indicated that bacteria responded differently to the surfaces on a scale of less than 1 nm change in the R(a) and R(q) Ti thin film surface roughness parameters by (i) an increased number of retained cells by a factor of 2-3, and (ii) an elevated level of secretion of extracellular polymeric substances.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/la902623c

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 205

Metadata

Authors
Ivanova, E. P., Truong, V. K., Wang, J. Y., Berndt, C. C., Jones, R. T., Yusuf, I. I., Peake, I., Schmidt, H. W., Fluke, C., Barnes, D., & Crawford, R. J.
Venue
Langmuir
Published
2009-10-20
Volume
26
Issue
3
Pages
1973-1982
ISSN
  • 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5827
OpenAlex
W2003327974
Cited by
205
References
1
FWCI
10.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impact of Nanoscale Roughness of Titanium Thin Film Surfaces on Bacterial Retention. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/la902623c
The paper
Ivanova, E. P., Truong, V. K., Wang, J. Y., Berndt, C. C., Jones, R. T., Yusuf, I. I., Peake, I., Schmidt, H. W., Fluke, C., Barnes, D., & Crawford, R. J. (2010). Impact of Nanoscale Roughness of Titanium Thin Film Surfaces on Bacterial Retention. Langmuir. https://doi.org/10.1021/la902623c

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.