Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 324

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Factors Affecting the Height and Phase Images in Tapping Mode Atomic Force Microscopy. Study of Phase-Separated Polymer Blends of Poly(ethene-co-styrene) and Poly(2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide)

Bar, G., Thomann, Y., Brandsch, R., Cantow, H.-J., Whangbo, M.-H.·1997·Langmuir

Abstract

Blends of two polymers, poly(ethene- co -styrene) (PES) and poly(2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide) (PPO), were examined with tapping mode atomic force microscopy (AFM) using various values of the driving amplitude A 0 and set-point amplitude ratio r sp = A sp / A 0, where A sp is the set-point amplitude. In height and phase images of PPO/PES blend samples, the relative contrast of chemically different regions depends sensitively on the r sp and A 0 values. As the tip−sample force is increased from small to large, both phase and height images of PPO/PES blend samples can undergo a contrast reversal twice. This makes it difficult to assign the features of height and phase images to different chemical components without performing additional experiments. Phase and height images were interpreted by analyzing several factors that affect the dependence of phase shift and amplitude damping on r sp and A 0 .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/la970091m

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Bar, G., Thomann, Y., Brandsch, R., Cantow, H.-J., & Whangbo, M.-H.
Venue
Langmuir
Published
1997-07-01
Volume
13
Issue
14
Pages
3807-3812
ISSN
  • 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5827
OpenAlex
W2047434889
Cited by
324
References
0
FWCI
12.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.