The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Quantitative Interpretation of the Response of Surface Plasmon Resonance Sensors to Adsorbed Films
Abstract
A simple but quantitative mathematical formalism for interpretation of surface plasmon resonance (SPR) signals from adsorbed films of a wide variety of structures is presented. It can be used to estimate adsorbed film thicknesses, surface coverages, or surface concentrations from the SPR response over the entire range of film thicknesses without relying on calibration curves of response versus known thicknesses or surface concentrations. This formalism is compared to more complex optical simulations. It is further tested by (1) calibrating the response of two SPR spectrometers to changes in bulk index of refraction, (2) using these calibrations with this formalism to predict responses to several well-characterized adlayer structures (alkanethiolates and serum albumin on gold, propylamine on COOH-functionalized gold), and then (3) comparing these predictions to measured SPR responses. Methods for estimating the refractive index of the adlayer material are also discussed. Detection limits in both bulk and adsorption-based analyses are discussed. The planar system used here has a detection limit of ∼0.003 nm in average film thickness for adsorbates whose refractive index differs from that of the solvent by only 0.1. The temperature sensitivities of these two SPR spectrometers are characterized and discussed in terms of detection limits.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Electrochemical Biosensors - Sensor Principles and Architectures
Grieshaber, D., MacKenzie, R., Vörös, J., & Reimhult, E. (2008) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s80314000 · Cited by 2,329
Ultrasensitive detection and characterization of biomolecules using superchiral fields
Hendry, E., Carpy, T., Johnston, J., Popland, M., Mikhaylovskiy, R. V., Lapthorn, A. J., Kelly, S. M., Barron, L. D., Gadegaard, N., & Kadodwala, M. (2010) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2010.209 · Cited by 1,258
Towards advanced chemical and biological nanosensors—An overview
Yonzon, C. R., Stuart, D. A., Zhang, X., McFarland, A. D., Haynes, C. L., & Van Duyne, R. P. (2005) · Talanta · doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2005.06.039 · Cited by 379
Quantitative multispectral biosensing and 1D imaging using quasi-3D plasmonic crystals
Stewart, M. E., Mack, N. H., Malyarchuk, V., Soares, J. A. N. T., Lee, T.-W., Gray, S. K., Nuzzo, R. G., & Rogers, J. A. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0606216103 · Cited by 340
Nanoplasmonic sensors for biointerfacial science
Jackman, J. A., Rahim Ferhan, A., & Cho, N.-J. (2017) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c6cs00494f · Cited by 258
Orelma, H., Filpponen, I., Johansson, L.-S., Laine, J., & Rojas, O. J. (2011) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/bm201236a · Cited by 200
Determining the Interfacial Refractive Index via Ultrasensitive Plasmonic Sensors
Zhan, C., Liu, B.-W., Tian, Z.-Q., & Ren, B. (2020) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.0c01907 · Cited by 56
Metadata
- Authors
- Jung, L. S., Campbell, C. T., Chinowsky, T. M., Mar, M. N., & Yee, S. S.
- Venue
- Langmuir
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1998-08-19
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 5636-5648
- ISSN
- 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5827
- OpenAlex
- W2029260679
- Cited by
- 1,012
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.