Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,012

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Quantitative Interpretation of the Response of Surface Plasmon Resonance Sensors to Adsorbed Films

Jung, Linda S., Campbell, Charles T., Chinowsky, Timothy M., Mar, Mimi N., Yee, Sinclair S.·1998·Langmuir

Abstract

A simple but quantitative mathematical formalism for interpretation of surface plasmon resonance (SPR) signals from adsorbed films of a wide variety of structures is presented. It can be used to estimate adsorbed film thicknesses, surface coverages, or surface concentrations from the SPR response over the entire range of film thicknesses without relying on calibration curves of response versus known thicknesses or surface concentrations. This formalism is compared to more complex optical simulations. It is further tested by (1) calibrating the response of two SPR spectrometers to changes in bulk index of refraction, (2) using these calibrations with this formalism to predict responses to several well-characterized adlayer structures (alkanethiolates and serum albumin on gold, propylamine on COOH-functionalized gold), and then (3) comparing these predictions to measured SPR responses. Methods for estimating the refractive index of the adlayer material are also discussed. Detection limits in both bulk and adsorption-based analyses are discussed. The planar system used here has a detection limit of ∼0.003 nm in average film thickness for adsorbates whose refractive index differs from that of the solvent by only 0.1. The temperature sensitivities of these two SPR spectrometers are characterized and discussed in terms of detection limits.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/la971228b

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Jung, L. S., Campbell, C. T., Chinowsky, T. M., Mar, M. N., & Yee, S. S.
Venue
Langmuir
Published
1998-08-19
Volume
14
Issue
19
Pages
5636-5648
ISSN
  • 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5827
OpenAlex
W2029260679
Cited by
1,012
References
0
FWCI
7.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.