Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 636

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Measuring the Elastic Properties of Thin Polymer Films with the Atomic Force Microscope

Domke, Jan, Radmacher, Manfred·1998·Langmuir

Abstract

The elastic properties of thin gelatin films were investigated with the atomic force microscope (AFM). The degree of swelling and thus the softness of the gelatin can be tuned by immersing it in mixtures of propanol and water. Therefore, we have chosen gelatin films as a model system to characterize the measurement of elasticity of thin and soft samples. The major aim of this study was to investigate the influence of the film thickness on the apparent elastic (Young's) modulus. Thus, we prepared wedge-shaped samples with a well-defined thickness of up to 1 μm. The Young's modulus of our samples was between 1 MPa and 20 kPa depending on the degree of swelling. The elasticity was calculated by analyzing the recorded force curves with the help of the Hertz model. We show that the calculated Young's modulus is dependent on the local film thickness and the applied loading force of the AFM tip. Thus, the influence of the hard substrate on the calculated softness of the film can be characterized as a function of indentation. It was possible to determine the elastic properties of gelatin films with a thickness down to 50 nm and a Young's modulus of ∼20 kPa.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/la9713006

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Domke, J., & Radmacher, M.
Venue
Langmuir
Published
1998-05-15
Volume
14
Issue
12
Pages
3320-3325
ISSN
  • 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5827
OpenAlex
W2070663004
Cited by
636
References
0
FWCI
8.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.