Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 174

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Contact-Inking Stamps for Microcontact Printing of Alkanethiols on Gold

Libioulle, Laurent, Bietsch, Alexander, Schmid, Heinz, Michel, Bruno, Delamarche, Emmanuel·1999·Langmuir

Abstract

Microcontact printing uses an inked patterned stamp to direct chemical reactions between molecules from the ink and the surface of a substrate. Here, we use this technique with solutions of alkanethiols as ink on the surface of the stamp and gold as the substrate to form a self-assembled monolayer in the regions of contact to protect the gold from a subsequent wet etch. We describe an alternative method for inking stamps based on their contact with an elastomer impregnated with ink. One of the principal findings is that control over the amount of ink transferred during inking from the inker pad to the stamp is possible by changing the concentration of the thiol solution used for impregnation. Contact inking partially localizes the ink where it is needed to form a protective self-assembled monolayer. As a consequence, the degree of completion of the printed monolayer becomes largely independent from the geometry of the pattern, and uncontrolled diffusion of the thiols during printing interferes noticeably less than when wet inking is performed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/la980978y

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 174

Metadata

Authors
Libioulle, L., Bietsch, A., Schmid, H., Michel, B., & Delamarche, E.
Venue
Langmuir
Published
1998-12-29
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
300-304
ISSN
  • 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5827
OpenAlex
W2069386846
Cited by
174
References
1
FWCI
8.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.