Cited by 253biodegradable polymer synthesis and propertiesAdvanced Polymer Synthesis and CharacterizationClick Chemistry and Applications

Combination of Ring-Opening Polymerization and “Click Chemistry”: Toward Functionalization and Grafting of Poly(ε-caprolactone)

Riva, Raphaël, Schmeits, Stéphanie, Jérôme, Christine, Jérôme, Robert, Lecomte, Philippe·2007·Macromolecules

Abstract

A straightforward strategy is proposed for the derivatization of poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL). First, statistical copolymerization of α-chloro-ε-caprolactone (αClεCL) with ε-caprolactone (εCL) was initiated by 2,2-dibutyl-2-stanna-1,3-dioxepane (DSDOP). In a second step, pendent chlorides were converted into azides by reaction with sodium azide. Finally, duly substituted terminal alkynes were reacted with pendent azides by copper-catalyzed Huisgen's 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition, thus a “click” reaction. According to this strategy, pendent hydroxyl and acrylate groups and atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) initiators were successfully attached to PCL. Similarly, amphiphilic graft copolymers were prepared by cycloaddition of an alkyne end-capped poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) onto the azide substituents of the copolyester. The dependence of the grafting yield on the experimental conditions of the “click” reaction, i.e., temperature, solvent, and catalyst, was investigated. This strategy is very versatile because a large variety of aliphatic polyesters can be easily synthesized from a single precursor, easily prepared from commercially available compounds, merely by changing the alkyne involved in the Huisgen's 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition. Last but not least, PCL subsituted by azide groups does not have to be isolated after substitution of chlorides by sodium azide, and the “click” reaction can be carried out in a “one-pot” process.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ma0624090

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PCL-g-PEO were synthesized by reaction of an alkyne end-group of PEO with poly(αN3εCL-co-εCL); grafting efficiency was approximately 30%, in line with yield reported for ATRA, and no degradation was detected.

    “PCL-g-PEO were also synthesized by reaction of an alkyne end-group of PEO (ω-alkyne-PEO) with poly(αN 3 εCL-co-εCL).The grafting efficiency was approximately 30% in line with the yield reported for ATRA.Importantly, no degradation was detected.”
  • The cycloaddition was complete in THF when poly(αN3εCL) homopolymer (Mn=46,000; Mw/Mn=1.6) was reacted with propargyl benzoate.

    “Indeed, the aforementioned cycloaddition was complete in THF when poly(αN 3 εCL) homopolymer (Mn=46,000 ; Mw/Mn=1.6) was reacted with propargyl benzoate.”
  • In a representative example, poly(αClεCL-co-εCL) (Mn=22,000; Mw/Mn=1.5) was reacted with 5 equivalents of sodium azide in DMF at room temperature overnight; then 5 equivalents of propargyl benzoate were added and the click reaction was quantitative at 35 °C for 3 h; a slight increase in polydispersity index was observed (Mw/Mn=1.7).

    “In a representative example, poly (αClεCL-co-εCL) (Mn=22,000 ; Mw/Mn= 1.5) was reacted with 5 equivalents of sodium azide in DMF at room temperature overnight.5 equivalents of propargyl benzoate were then added to the reaction mixture, and the “click” reaction was quantitative at 35 °C for 3 h.A slight increase in the polydispersity index was observed (Mw/Mn= 1.7).”
  • Cycloaddition of both propargyl benzoate mediated by CuI and triethylamine and 3-dimethylaminoethyl-1-propyne mediated by CuI turned out to be quantitative with no significant degradation.

    “Cycloaddition of both propargyl benzoate mediated by Cul and triethylamine (NEt 3 ) and 3-dimethylaminoethyl-1-propyne mediated by Cul turned out to be quantitative with no significant degradation [153] (Scheme 16).”
  • Polycationic polyesters were prepared by using N,N,N-triethylammonium propargyl bromide as the alkyne reagent.

    “Indeed, polycationic polyesters were prepared by using N,N,N-triethylammonium propargyl bromide as the alkyne reagent.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Riva, R., Schmeits, S., Jérôme, C., Jérôme, R., & Lecomte, P.
Affiliations
University of Liège (BE)
Venue
Macromolecules
Published
2007-01-17
Volume
40
Issue
4
Pages
796-803
ISSN
  • 0024-9297 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5835
OpenAlex
W2089394496
Cited by
253
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 24
FWCI
16.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Macromolecules (publishedVersion)
  • ORBi (University of Liège) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS
  • Fonds pour la Formation à la Recherche dans l’Industrie et dans l’Agriculture
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Click Chemistry and Applications
Keywords
polycaprolactone, ring-opening polymerization, click chemistry, copper-catalyzed azide-alkyne cycloaddition, sodium azide, graft copolymers, amphiphilic copolymers, poly(ethylene oxide), hydroxyl end groups, one-pot synthesis, aliphatic polyesters

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review