The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Self-Healing of Unentangled Polymer Networks with Reversible Bonds
Open accessAbstract
Self-healing polymeric materials are systems that after damage can revert to their original state with full or partial recovery of mechanical strength. Using scaling theory we study a simple model of autonomic self-healing of unentangled polymer networks. In this model one of the two end monomers of each polymer chain is fixed in space mimicking dangling chains attachment to a polymer network, while the sticky monomer at the other end of each chain can form pairwise reversible bond with the sticky end of another chain. We study the reaction kinetics of reversible bonds in this simple model and analyze the different stages in the self-repair process. The formation of bridges and the recovery of the material strength across the fractured interface during the healing period occur appreciably faster after shorter waiting time, during which the fractured surfaces are kept apart. We observe the slowest formation of bridges for self-adhesion after bringing into contact two bare surfaces with equilibrium (very low) density of open stickers in comparison with self-healing. The primary role of anomalous diffusion in material self-repair for short waiting times is established, while at long waiting times the recovery of bonds across fractured interface is due to hopping diffusion of stickers between different bonded partners. Acceleration in bridge formation for self-healing compared to self-adhesion is due to excess non-equilibrium concentration of open stickers. Full recovery of reversible bonds across fractured interface (formation of bridges) occurs after appreciably longer time than the equilibration time of the concentration of reversible bonds in the bulk.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dynamics of entangled linear polymer melts: A molecular-dynamics simulation
Kremer, K., & Grest, G. S. (1990) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.458541 · Cited by 4,023
Silica-Like Malleable Materials from Permanent Organic Networks
Montarnal, D., Capelot, M., Tournilhac, F., & Leibler, L. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1212648 · Cited by 3,625
Making Insoluble Polymer Networks Malleable via Olefin Metathesis
Lu, Y.-X., Tournilhac, F., Leibler, L., & Guan, Z. (2012) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja303356z · Cited by 568
Cited by
Self-Healing Injectable Hydrogels for Tissue Regeneration
Bertsch, P., Diba, M., Mooney, D. J., & Leeuwenburgh, S. C. G. (2023) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00179 · Cited by 892
Dynamic covalent chemistry in polymer networks: a mechanistic perspective
Winne, J. M., Leibler, L., & Du Prez, F. E. (2019) · Polymer Chemistry · doi:10.1039/c9py01260e · Cited by 736
Self-citationZhang, Z. P., Rong, M. Z., & Zhang, M. Q. (2018) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2018.03.002 · Cited by 586
Lei, Z., & Wu, P. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-11364-w · Cited by 432
Molecular Characterization of Polymer Networks
Danielsen, S. P. O., Beech, H. K., Wang, S., El-Zaatari, B. M., Wang, X., Sapir, L., Ouchi, T., Wang, Z., Johnson, P. N., Hu, Y., et al. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01304 · Cited by 336
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Stukalin, E. B., Cai, L.-H., Kumar, N. A., Leibler, L., & Rubinstein, M.
- Venue
- Macromolecules
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2013-09-11
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 7525-7541
- ISSN
- 0024-9297 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5835
- OpenAlex
- W2051962655
- Cited by
- 399
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 13.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.