Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 270

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Immobilized Polymer Layers on Spherical Nanoparticles

Harton, Shane E., Kumar, Sanat K., Yang, Hoichang, Koga, Tadanori, Hicks, Kyle, Lee, HyungKi, Mijovic, Jovan, Liu, Ming, Vallery, Richard S., Gidley, David W.·2010·Macromolecules
DOI 10.1021/ma902484d
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Polymer properties, such as their mechanical strength, barrier properties, and dielectric response, can be dramatically improved by the addition of nanoparticles. This improvement is thought to be because the surface area per unit mass of particles increases with decreasing particle size, R, as 1/ R . This favorable effect has to be reconciled with the expectation that at small enough R the nanoparticles must behave akin to a solvent and cause a deterioration of properties. How does this transition in behavior from large solutes to the solvent limit occur? We conjecture that for small enough particles the layer of polymer affected by the particles (“bound” polymer layer) must be much smaller than that for large particles: the favorable effect of increasing particle surface area can thus be overcome and lead to the small solvent limit with unfavorable mechanical properties, for example. To substantiate this picture requires that we measure and compare the “bound polymer layer” formed on nanoparticles with those near large particles with equivalent chemistry. We have implemented a novel strategy to obtain uniform nanoparticle dispersion in polymers, a problem for many previous works. Then, by combining theory and a suite of experimental techniques, including differential scanning calorimetry and positron annihilation lifetime spectroscopy, we show that the immobilized poly(2-vinylpyridine) layer near 15 nm diameter silica particles (∼1 nm) is considerably thinner than that at flat silica surfaces (∼4 to 5 nm), which is the limit of an infinitely large particle. We have also determined that the changes in the polymer’s glass-transition temperature due to the presence of this strongly interacting surface are very small in both well-dispersed nanocomposites and thin films (<100 nm). Similarly, the polymer’s fragility, as determined by dielectric spectroscopy, is also found to be little affected in the nanocomposites relative to the pure polymer. While a systematic study of the dependence of the bound polymer layer thickness on particle size remains an outstanding challenge, this first study provides conclusive evidence for the hypothesis that the bound polymer layer can be significantly smaller around nanoparticles than at chemically similar flat surfaces.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ma902484d

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 270

Metadata

Authors
Harton, S. E., Kumar, S. K., Yang, H., Koga, T., Hicks, K., Lee, H., Mijovic, J., Liu, M., Vallery, R. S., & Gidley, D. W.
Venue
Macromolecules
Publisher
American Chemical Society (ACS)
Published
2010-03-02
Volume
43
Issue
7
Pages
3415-3421
ISSN
  • 0024-9297 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5835
DOI
10.1021/ma902484d
OpenAlex
W1998201069
Cited by
270
References
26
FWCI
13.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.