Cited by 458Polymer crystallization and propertiesBlock Copolymer Self-AssemblyAdvanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization

Compatibilizers for melt blending: premade block copolymers

Macosko, C. W., Guégan, Philippe, Khandpur, Ashish K., Nakayama, Akinari, Marechal, Philippe, Inoue, Takashi·1996·Macromolecules

Abstract

Poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) was melt mixed 30:70 into polystyrene (PS) with and without symmetric P(S- b -MMA) diblock copolymers. The molecular weight of the components was varied. After 5 min of shear mixing, the PMMA was dispersed into roughly spherical, submicron particles. Particle size was measured by light scattering and transmission electron microscopy. As little as 1% copolymer led to a significant reduction in PMMA particle size, although larger amounts were needed to make the particles stable to annealing (180 °C for 15 min). The principle role of block copolymers in controlling morphology appears to be in preventing coalescence. Preventing dynamic coalescence leads to size reduction, while preventing static coalescence results in stability or compatibilization. We estimate that less than 5% of the interface needs to be covered to prevent dynamic coalescence while ∼20% is necessary to impart static stability. Mobility, critical micelle concentration, and molecular weight of the block copolymer also appear to be important. Lowering the molecular weight of the PMMA phase from 43 000 to 11 000 resulted in dramatically lower particle size (700 vs 60 nm). These variables are discussed in terms of a qualitative balance between rate of diffusion and rate of area generation during blending.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ma9602482

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A compatibilizer can efficiently suppress changes in the phase structure during polymer blend processing.

    “It is also very important that compatibilizer can efficiently suppress changes in the phase structure during polymer blends processing (Macosko et al., 1996;Marić and Macosko, 2002;Horak et al., 2005).”

    From Phase Structure, Compatibility, and Toughness of PLA/PCL Blends: A Review (2019) · cites this paper as Macosko et al., 1996

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Macosko, C. W., Guégan, P., Khandpur, A. K., Nakayama, A., Marechal, P., & Inoue, T.
Affiliations
Tokyo Institute of Technology (JP)
Venue
Macromolecules
Published
1996-01-01
Volume
29
Issue
17
Pages
5590-5598
ISSN
  • 0024-9297 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5835
OpenAlex
W2017813118
Cited by
458
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 17
FWCI
13.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Macromolecules (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer crystallization and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Block Copolymer Self-Assembly
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization
Keywords
compatibilizer, block copolymers, melt blending, poly(methyl methacrylate), polystyrene, polymer blends, particle size, morphology control, coalescence, annealing stability, critical micelle concentration, molecular weight effects, diffusion rate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review