The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Characterization of the Network Structure of Carbodiimide Cross-Linked Gelatin Gels
Abstract
The network structure of native and carbodiimide cross-linked gelatin A and B gels was studied based on their rheological behavior. Gelatin A and B contain different numbers of carboxylic acid groups caused by different preparation conditions and had previously shown different characteristics in controlled release applications. It was evaluated to which extent chemical cross-linking densified the network structure of physical gelatin gels. After normalization of the equilibrium shear modulus ( G e ) with respect to swelling ( Q ), it was observed that the normalized G e values largely depend on the way gelatin is prepared from collagen. At an equal number of chemical junctions, chemically cross-linked gelatin B gels had a lower elasticity modulus than chemically cross-linked gelatin A gels. This seemed contradictory as gelatin B contains more carboxylic acid groups, available for cross-linking, but is related to a higher probability for intramolecular cross-linking, as was validated quantitatively by chemical and rheological analysis of the number of cross-links. Assuming an ideal network, the average molecular weight of the elastic network chains ( M c ) was calculated for physical and chemical gelatin A and B networks, and on the basis of M c the mesh sizes of the gels were estimated. The calculated mesh sizes were experimentally confirmed by lysozyme and albumin diffusion. Chemical cross-linking increased the resistance of the gels toward thermal degradation, resulting in a more gradual disintegration of physical cross-links upon heating. Moreover, chemical cross-linking prevented recombination of these cross-links upon cooling.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Designing hydrogels for controlled drug delivery
Li, J., & Mooney, D. J. (2016) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2016.71 · Cited by 4,832
Stimuli-reponsive polymers and their bioconjugates
GIL, E., & HUDSON, S. (2004) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2004.08.003 · Cited by 2,385
Cell-laden microengineered gelatin methacrylate hydrogels
Nichol, J. W., Koshy, S. T., Bae, H., Hwang, C. M., Yamanlar, S., & Khademhosseini, A. (2010) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.03.064 · Cited by 2,377
Soft Materials by Design: Unconventional Polymer Networks Give Extreme Properties
Zhao, X., Chen, X., Yuk, H., Lin, S., Liu, X., & Parada, G. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01088 · Cited by 1,161
Bigi, A., Cojazzi, G., Panzavolta, S., Rubini, K., & Roveri, N. (2001) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00236-2 · Cited by 891
Metadata
- Authors
- Kuijpers, A. J., Engbers, G. H. M., Feijen, J., De Smedt, S. C., Meyvis, T. K. L., Demeester, J., Krijgsveld, J., Zaat, S. A. J., & Dankert, J.
- Venue
- Macromolecules
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1999-04-21
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 3325-3333
- ISSN
- 0024-9297 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5835
- OpenAlex
- W2056725095
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characterization of the Network Structure of Carbodiimide Cross-Linked Gelatin Gels. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ma981929v
- The paper
- Kuijpers, A. J., Engbers, G. H. M., Feijen, J., De Smedt, S. C., Meyvis, T. K. L., Demeester, J., Krijgsveld, J., Zaat, S. A. J., & Dankert, J. (1999). Characterization of the Network Structure of Carbodiimide Cross-Linked Gelatin Gels. Macromolecules. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma981929v
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.