Cited by 487Rheology and Fluid Dynamics StudiesMaterial Dynamics and PropertiesPolymer crystallization and properties

Packing Length Influence in Linear Polymer Melts on the Entanglement, Critical, and Reptation Molecular Weights

Fetters, Lewis J., Lohse, David J., Milner, Scott T., Graessley, William W.·1999·Macromolecules

Abstract

We have shown in previous studies that the entanglement molecular weight for a polymer melt, M e, is related by a power law to p, the packing length of the polymer species. We now find that power laws also describe the molecular weights characterizing the melt viscosity, M c marking the onset of entanglement effects and M r the crossover to the reptation form. The packing length exponents for M e, M c, and M r differ significantly, however. The long-held notion that the ratio M c / M e has the same value for all species is therefore incorrect. Further, the observed and predicted values of M r for two species, 1,4-polybutadiene and polyisobutylene, have been found to agree, within the uncertainties, with the projected values. Finally, the variations with packing length are such that all three characteristic molecular weights would appear to converge on the same value near p = 9 Å. As yet, no species with such a large packing length has been completely studied rheologically. But the range is not outlandish and is clearly reachable by appropriate synthetic methods.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ma990620o

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • By introducing n-alkyl substituents of different sizes, it is possible to tune entanglement molar mass without significantly elevating the glass transition temperature.

    “We have shown in this work that by introducing nalkyl substituents of di ff erent sizes it is possible to tune entanglement molar mass without signi fi cantly elevating the glass transition temperature. 78”

    From Aliphatic Polyester Block Polymer Design (2016) · cites this paper as [78]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fetters, L. J., Lohse, D. J., Milner, S. T., & Graessley, W. W.
Affiliations
  • ExxonMobil (United States) (US)
  • Princeton University (US)
Venue
Macromolecules
Published
1999-09-09
Volume
32
Issue
20
Pages
6847-6851
ISSN
  • 0024-9297 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5835
OpenAlex
W2057831455
Cited by
487
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 13
FWCI
18.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Macromolecules (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes › Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Material Dynamics and Properties
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer crystallization and properties
Keywords
entanglement molecular weight, critical molecular weight, melt viscosity, power-law scaling, 1,4-polybutadiene, polyisobutylene, polymer rheology, chain conformation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review