The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Self-Concentrations and Effective Glass Transition Temperatures in Polymer Blends
Abstract
In a miscible polymer blend the local environment of a monomer of type A will, on average, be rich in A compared to the bulk composition, φ, and similarly for B; this is a direct consequence of chain connectivity. As a result, the local dynamics of the two chains may exhibit different dependences on temperature and overall composition. By assigning a length scale (or volume) to particular dynamic mode, the relevant “self-concentration” φ s can be estimated. For example, we associate the Kuhn length of the chain, l K, with the monomeric friction factor, ζ, and thus the composition and temperature dependences of ζ should be influenced by φ s calculated for a volume V ∼ l K 3 . An effective local composition, φ eff, can then be calculated from φ s and φ. As lower T g polymers are generally more flexible, the associated φ s is larger, and the local dynamics in the mixture may be quite similar to the pure material. The higher T g component, on the other hand, may have a smaller φ s, and thus its dynamics in the mixture would be more representative of the average blend composition. An effective glass transition temperature for each component, T g eff, can be estimated from the composition-dependent bulk average T g as T g (φ eff ). This analysis provides a direct estimate of the difference in the apparent T g 's for the two components in miscible blends, in reasonable agreement with those reported in the literature for four different systems. Furthermore, this approach can reconcile other features of miscible blend dynamics, including the asymmetric broadening of the calorimetric T g, the differing effects of blending on the segmental relaxation times of the two components, and the failure of time−temperature superposition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
On the Temperature Dependence of Cooperative Relaxation Properties in Glass-Forming Liquids
Adam, G., & Gibbs, J. H. (1965) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1696442 · Cited by 5,836
Supercooled Liquids and Glasses
Ediger, M. D., Angell, C. A., & Nagel, S. R. (1996) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jp953538d · Cited by 2,220
Fetters, L. J., Lohse, D. J., Richter, D., Witten, T. A., & Zirkel, A. (1994) · Macromolecules · doi:10.1021/ma00095a001 · Cited by 1,999
Heterogeneity at the glass transition: a review
Sillescu, H. (1999) · Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids · doi:10.1016/s0022-3093(98)00831-x · Cited by 1,004
The size of cooperatively rearranging regions at the glass transition
Donth, E. (1982) · Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids · doi:10.1016/0022-3093(82)90089-8 · Cited by 601
Tracht, U., Wilhelm, M., Heuer, A., Feng, H., Schmidt-Rohr, K., & Spiess, H. W. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.81.2727 · Cited by 555
Fetters, L. J., Lohse, D. J., Milner, S. T., & Graessley, W. W. (1999) · Macromolecules · doi:10.1021/ma990620o · Cited by 487
Temperature dependence of characteristic length for glass transition
Fischer, E. W., Donth, E., & Steffen, W. (1992) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.68.2344 · Cited by 257
Zetsche, A., & Fischer, E. W. (1994) · Acta Polymerica · doi:10.1002/actp.1994.010450306 · Cited by 226
Concentration fluctuation induced dynamic heterogeneities in polymer blends
Kumar, S. K., Colby, R. H., Anastasiadis, S. H., & Fytas, G. (1996) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.472198 · Cited by 209
Cited by
Glass transition of polymers in bulk, confined geometries, and near interfaces
Napolitano, S., Glynos, E., & Tito, N. B. (2017) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aa5284 · Cited by 420
Samuel, C., Barrau, S., Lefebvre, J.-M., Raquez, J.-M., & Dubois, P. (2014) · Macromolecules · doi:10.1021/ma500846x · Cited by 175
Segmental dynamics in miscible polymer blends: Recent results and open questions
Colmenero, J., & Arbe, A. (2007) · Soft Matter · doi:10.1039/b710141d · Cited by 172
Rathi, S. R., Coughlin, E. B., Hsu, S. L., Golub, C. S., Ling, G. H., & Tzivanis, M. J. (2012) · Polymer · doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2012.05.005 · Cited by 63
Dynamic heterogeneity in fully miscible blends of polystyrene with oligostyrene
Harmandaris, V. A., Kremer, K., & Floudas, G. (2013) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.110.165701 · Cited by 38
Effective soft-core potentials and mesoscopic simulations of binary polymer mixtures
McCarty, J., Lyubimov, I. Y., & Guenza, M. G. (2010) · Macromolecules · doi:10.1021/ma100052z · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Lodge, T. P., & McLeish, T. C. B.
- Venue
- Macromolecules
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2000-06-13
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 5278-5284
- ISSN
- 0024-9297 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5835
- OpenAlex
- W2057009283
- Cited by
- 579
- References
- 26
- FWCI
- 9.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.