Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 579

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Self-Concentrations and Effective Glass Transition Temperatures in Polymer Blends

Lodge, Timothy P., McLeish, Thomas C. B.·2000·Macromolecules

Abstract

In a miscible polymer blend the local environment of a monomer of type A will, on average, be rich in A compared to the bulk composition, φ, and similarly for B; this is a direct consequence of chain connectivity. As a result, the local dynamics of the two chains may exhibit different dependences on temperature and overall composition. By assigning a length scale (or volume) to particular dynamic mode, the relevant “self-concentration” φ s can be estimated. For example, we associate the Kuhn length of the chain, l K, with the monomeric friction factor, ζ, and thus the composition and temperature dependences of ζ should be influenced by φ s calculated for a volume V ∼ l K 3 . An effective local composition, φ eff, can then be calculated from φ s and φ. As lower T g polymers are generally more flexible, the associated φ s is larger, and the local dynamics in the mixture may be quite similar to the pure material. The higher T g component, on the other hand, may have a smaller φ s, and thus its dynamics in the mixture would be more representative of the average blend composition. An effective glass transition temperature for each component, T g eff, can be estimated from the composition-dependent bulk average T g as T g (φ eff ). This analysis provides a direct estimate of the difference in the apparent T g 's for the two components in miscible blends, in reasonable agreement with those reported in the literature for four different systems. Furthermore, this approach can reconcile other features of miscible blend dynamics, including the asymmetric broadening of the calorimetric T g, the differing effects of blending on the segmental relaxation times of the two components, and the failure of time−temperature superposition.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ma9921706

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 579

Metadata

Authors
Lodge, T. P., & McLeish, T. C. B.
Venue
Macromolecules
Published
2000-06-13
Volume
33
Issue
14
Pages
5278-5284
ISSN
  • 0024-9297 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5835
OpenAlex
W2057009283
Cited by
579
References
26
FWCI
9.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.